Michael Hastings
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2006
- Messages
- 4,191
- Reaction score
- 21
- Points
- 38
- Location
- Florida
- Website
- www.aquavideo.com
Hey Mike,
As promised here are the images of the MPE65mm Macro Lens. The first image shows the focal working distances for each selected ratio.
When you look at it though you could probably get away with using one port when shooting 2:1 or 1:1. The results I get at those ratios are some of the most pleasing. After that one tends to require a flat subject to get any decent sense of what the image is, not just the eyeball for example.
Cheers,
Mark.
Mark: I can see that the MP-E 65 is the bomb for surface macro, but in looking at the distances at just seems like we would be normally better of to keep it simple by using the 100 macro, or as alternatives the 65 EF-s or EF180
Here are the lens to subject distances at closest focus.
100mm 5.5" at 1:1 fullframe 1.6x on red
60mm 3.27" at 1:1 1:1 also on red
180mm 10.1" at 1:1 fullframe 1.6x on red
The 100 and 180 are full frame lenses so we would get approx 1.6x on the RED at the same close focus distance since you are cropping out the center. I've posted a quick shot I took of a dime (shutter 125 @ 5.6 on the Canon 40D) at roughly the closest focusing distance. Don't judge the quality, I just ran out and stuck a dime on the porch step to show the size. The 16x9 is virtually exactly what you would get on RED, the the other is the full shot on the 40D (just a bit more top and bottom).
Seems to me this is probably pretty close to the practical limit for shooting something small in open water. Also, if you were using the 100 or 180mm you could get double the magnification to 3.2x by using a decent achromatic +2 diopter with very little degradation. The 100mm is only a 58mm thread so wouldn't be that expensive.
Because focus and iris can be controlled by birger, all you would do to change from one lens to the other is unscrew the dome port and put on the macro port.
It would also be pretty easy if I can figure the LED stuff to make a port with the ring light built into it and I think that might be a more beneficial use of the time rather than trying to make an adjustable port for the 65.
If you were okay with a limited range on the 65 it wouldn't be much more complicated - just a matter of gearing for the focus.
PS I'll post the photo later REDUSER seems to be cranky right now and won't take them even though within the limits. PPs got it by doing one at a time - 2 edits???