Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

What is the most compressed you can do

Tom Frisch

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Most people are going to try to shoot the most pristine footage possible with cameras like Red, but for documentary work, often the record time is more important than ultimate image quality.

Can I assume that the most compressed format out of the Scarlet will be REDCODE 28? If not, are there any plans for a super-compressed mode that would look mediocre, but record for a long time? (like HDV quality)?

I apologize if this has been asked before, but I couldn't find any reference to it online.

-Tom
------------------
http://www.tom11.com
 
I realize that comparing REDCODE anything to HDV is pretty hilarious, but I'd also really like a low bit-rate shooting mode option, and I don't think I'm alone on this. The excuse that "memory prices are falling at such a rate that file size doesn't matter" doesn't fly with me. I bought into that when I got an HVX200 years ago, and the prices have never come down to what people were expecting. So are there any plans for Redcode 5 or 10 or 20? Does the codec scale well in that direction?

I ask this mainly because Jim's response on the 3K s35 poll was "just use more compression if you want smaller file sizes"

-Tom

-------------------
http://www.tom11.com
 
I'm surprised that no one has responded to this. Am I way off base?
 
Are there any plans for a super-compressed mode that would look mediocre, but record for a long time?

None have been announced; however, it's been mentioned several times and I'm sure RED is aware of the need. It's an issue of programming resources to develop it as well as hardware resources inside the camera to handle the increased work.
 
None have been announced

Actually, Jim did state a few days ago (I think in one of Peter's threads on Scarletuser) that if you didn't need so much resolution and/or storage, you could just select a lower compression rate. He may have been hinting at something like this.
 
The excuse that "memory prices are falling at such a rate that file size doesn't matter" doesn't fly with me. I bought into that when I got an HVX200 years ago, and the prices have never come down to what people were expecting.

The difference is not the memory costs it's the form. The Red camera has used a commodity form factor, unlike Sony and Panasonic which use proprietary form factors. Memory prices are coming down to the extent that we will be able to keep them on the shelf like other archival media. Sandisk announced long life media ( 100 years plus!) but only in small sizes, so maybe this will become a realistic option in a few years.
 
Back
Top