Graeme Nattress
RED Problem Solver
What Sony 28mp camera? Their new one is 24.6mp and cannot even do live view....
Graeme
Graeme
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What Sony 28mp camera? Their new one is 24.6mp and cannot even do live view....
Graeme
What Sony 28mp camera? Their new one is 24.6mp and cannot even do live view....
Graeme
ONE has (two) rolling shutter(s).
Works pretty neat, though
Unacceptable skew.
I don't think a DSRL formfactor will serve any good for shooting professional news stuff out of your hands. Skew or not, it won't look great anyway.
Thanks for the info gunleik.
Although the Red One's Mysterium sensor is shrouded in certain amount of secrecy, what is the closest thing to an industrial "white paper" on the Mysterium in terms of timmings and waveforms, for example as you mention a dual rolling shutter. Where is the best technical document on the RED ONE in terms of its image acquisition and potential temporal/spatial displacement charcateristics. We need to crunch the numbers on this one. Any ideas anyone?
Cheers,
People have asked for more precise technical details before from Red, but they were not answered. I believe your best bet is to simply rent or borrow a Red and do whatever specific tests you need. Skew in particular has been extensively tested already, if you search past Reduser posts.
Thanks Eric and Jbeale.
Actually i bought one Red one, but I'm still waiting so far:bye2: :bye2: :bye2:
I don't think a DSRL formfactor will serve any good for shooting professional news stuff out of your hands. Skew or not, it won't look great anyway.
So put it on a shoulder mount, still much lighter than a RED.
The question isn't whether it will compete with REDONE, it doesn't - but how does it compete with the Panasonic HVX Sony HVR and Canon HV30 worlds?
Well, I was this close to buying a HV20/30 + Letus 35 Mini combo when this DSLR madness started. The timing has to be a sign from above. So, here is one confirmed case of the 5D MkII competing with Canon's DV-cams + 35mm DOF adapters.
Take a look at some shots with a little production value. Top of page.
http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/eos5dm2/02.html#02
Impressive for there first try.
Now if they take a serious look at the XL they might actually put something together that would sell some units.
I know i'm getting one for the bag.
"Look it's not a REDONE - there are situations where rolling shutter artifacts will be an issue, but a lot of times it won't be an issue and this proves you can make some pretty darn nice movies if you keep the limitations in mind."
QUOTE]
I admire your optimism. I am definitely buying the Canon 5D MII when its available mainly for stills and to see what it is capable of dynamically. However, frankly I think for most applications the amount of Jelly will be a bit too much to take. So for example, a very slow well set up pan of a landscape, might be nice. However a medium shot of two people just carrying on a conversation at the normal speeds which people generally “animate” themselves will (I reckon) have visible or odd rolling shutter artifacts. Similarly a close up on someone’s face while talking/delivering their dialogue will also probably reveal rolling shutter artifacts. If it doesn’t, then that would be truly awesome.
Perhaps after we both get a 5D MII (in a few months), we can compare notes as to what can or can’t be shot to produce “acceptable results”. [maybee for under water work the rolling shutter makes everything look even more aquatic!]
Cheers,
Eric
The Mark II is a DSLR, not really a video camera. Video is a nice added feature, but it's not a replacement for a good HD body and good glass. It looks like it will produce stuff well for the web on a tripod, not really for feature films. Thoughts?