What's the difference between the Sachtler Video 18 ii and iii series of heads? Was there any revolutionary technological improvement, or is it just an extra "i" on the label? Is the 18 adequate for a lightweight Red setup?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
It depends what you find adequate. If you are looking for a lightweight solution for remote locations you will be happy. If you are looking for a strong camera support the Video 18 is too light as all 100mm based fluid heads are
It also helps looking worldwide. If you have friends in places like France, Germany, UK, you can also search those localized eBays. I managed thus to get a pretty good deal on a Sachtler 20 III.
While on eBay, use brackets when searching, they act as "or"s. Look for example for (sachtler, satchler, cartoni, vinten) and worldwide.
Good luck!
Hans. Do you mean if you are using RED or Cine lenses? For those using Nikon or Canon (not the big telephotos) primes and zooms the video 18 works very well, especially if you are using screw in filters (no matte box) and are recording on the cards.
Is the 100mm head really that critical? The Miller Arrow55 and Sachtler Video20 are capable of 50lbs+, but utilize a 100mm head. Does it impact their performance significantly?
?
My Sachtler Video 20II handles the RED very nicely even with a fairly heavy set up. However, a longer bridgeplate (I got the ET 1030 12" attached to the ET 19mm Base) is a must to keep things balanced. Without it you will seriously be straining the tilt loads on the head.
My 2 cents
Cam