Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Have you ever seen a 160 million pixel 6x17 digital photo-camera?

shooter said:
Have you ever seen $40,000 in $1 dollar bills stacked up? :)

(and that's without the lens...)

-shooter
Click to expand...

No, but I saw 3k once, sterling. It was sitting on a table wearing only an elastic band. It looked good, pocket sized.

edit: I`ve just posted this and realised (as I wrote "pocket sized", to be precise) 3k is what scarlet may cost ($), which is coincidental. Scarlet is also pocket sized, which I was also not thinking about as I wrote above line. Not wishing to look like a fanboy, I should point out, 3k cash, will also fit into a large coat pocket (if tightly rolled), the story is true, any implied Red endorsement accidental, and I am sad for never having even seen a bigger cash wad (or is that average? lets not go there), but feeling better for knowing 4digits will buy 3k motion capture. Cleared that up. I`m now wishing scarlet was around when I did see that 3k (sterling), so I could be shooting in Red stereoscopic already
 
Yeah, I saw it the last five or six times it was posted here. :)

I wonder how this camera would do for long-exposure astrophotography?
 
I wonder how this camera would do for long-exposure astrophotography?
Click to expand...

i think it has 1 scond max exposure .... so it's not good for astrophotography
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top