Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

NAB Head/Tripod Experience

Jason Ing

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 3, 2007
Messages
1,684
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Los Angeles
Just wanted to share the NAB info I got... good, bad, or unknowingly incorrect.

If you have better info, please share too. :)

My everyday config will be birger/canon/mattebox with the thought of renting lenses and eventually getting Red's primes or 18-85 lens. So the weight I figured was 20-40(+) pounds. This was rough guesstimates (someone tell me if I'm way off). I also will be getting some sort of low budget dolly and jib setup.

I mostly focused on the heads, so the tripod info I'm still going to learn more.

I looked at Oconnor, Sachtler, Miller, Panther, and Cartoni.

To cut to the chase, I chose Cartoni's Delta head.

There were other deciding factors, but surprisingly, I found that the counterbalance was what differentiated most of the heads and became one of the main deciding factors (in general, they're all pretty good). Miller, Panther, and Sachtler uses a step system as opposed to Catroni's and Oconnor's continuous system. Continuous vs step makes a huge difference in the setup and performance of the counterbalance. With Catroni and Oconnor, I could tilt the camera forward and backward at any degree and it would stay put. Coupled with the fluid head and drag system, this allowed me to do a pan/tilt/combo movement with one finger (no, I didn't lose my other nine fingers in a shark encounter; but it impressed upon me the precision of these heads). I noticed with sachtler, miller and panther, the camera would tilt forward/backward even after it was supposed to stop. The reps would fuss with it a lot but couldn't get it exactly right. I was told and there are probably users out there that can get this kind of precision counterbalance on a miller, panther, and sachtler but it says something to me that the reps couldn't get that kind of performance that catroni or oconnor could show me in the equal time allowed for the setup and demo. Maybe there was a coincidence that all the step systems had incompetent reps? :)

So it came down to oconnor and catroni. as far as oconnor's 1030 vs the 2060. i ruled out the 2060 for these reasons: 1) twice the cost; 2) almost twice the weight (2060 is heavy!); 3) the 1030's 100mm ball will fit the jib systems that i'm considering. However, the 2060 has a nice crank to adjust the counterbalance. The 1030 has a partially covered dial at the base of the head which was difficult to use to say the least.

So, between the Delta and 1030, the counterbalance is way easier to use on the Delta. The delta can carry up to 48 pounds vs the 1030's 41 pounds (the 1030 HDS studio head). And a small extra plus, the delta has a lit digital readout. :)

I was told the delta's fluid system is different then oconnor. so the delta doesn't leak as opposed to oconnor that supposedly could (but to be fair, the source of that bit of info came from the delta rep)

And one more major point: Delta has a 5 year warranty, everyone else has 2 year (If I'm wrong on this, please let me know).

Listed price of a 1030 head is $4790. The delta is listed at $5295. Only $500 difference. Since it's list price, I'm sure they can be gotten for cheaper.

Okay, so that's my tripod/head experience at NAB. It was admittedly a blur of reps, booths, and equipment! So, I'll be the first to say that I could have gotten things wrong on my info. :)
 
Just wanted to share the NAB info I got... good, bad, or unknowingly incorrect.

If you have better info, please share too. :)

My everyday config will be birger/canon/mattebox with the thought of renting lenses and eventually getting Red's primes or 18-85 lens. So the weight I figured was 20-40(+) pounds. This was rough guesstimates (someone tell me if I'm way off). I also will be getting some sort of low budget dolly and jib setup.

I mostly focused on the heads, so the tripod info I'm still going to learn more.

I looked at Oconnor, Sachtler, Miller, Panther, and Cartoni.

To cut to the chase, I chose Cartoni's Delta head.

There were other deciding factors, but surprisingly, I found that the counterbalance was what differentiated most of the heads and became one of the main deciding factors (in general, they're all pretty good). Miller, Panther, and Sachtler uses a step system as opposed to Catroni's and Oconnor's continuous system. Continuous vs step makes a huge difference in the setup and performance of the counterbalance. With Catroni and Oconnor, I could tilt the camera forward and backward at any degree and it would stay put. Coupled with the fluid head and drag system, this allowed me to do a pan/tilt/combo movement with one finger (no, I didn't lose my other nine fingers in a shark encounter; but it impressed upon me the precision of these heads). I noticed with sachtler, miller and panther, the camera would tilt forward/backward even after it was supposed to stop. The reps would fuss with it a lot but couldn't get it exactly right. I was told and there are probably users out there that can get this kind of precision counterbalance on a miller, panther, and sachtler but it says something to me that the reps couldn't get that kind of performance that catroni or oconnor could show me in the equal time allowed for the setup and demo. Maybe there was a coincidence that all the step systems had incompetent reps? :)

So it came down to oconnor and catroni. as far as oconnor's 1030 vs the 2060. i ruled out the 2060 for these reasons: 1) twice the cost; 2) almost twice the weight (2060 is heavy!); 3) the 1030's 100mm ball will fit the jib systems that i'm considering. However, the 2060 has a nice crank to adjust the counterbalance. The 1030 has a partially covered dial at the base of the head which was difficult to use to say the least.

So, between the Delta and 1030, the counterbalance is way easier to use on the Delta. The delta can carry up to 48 pounds vs the 1030's 41 pounds (the 1030 HDS studio head). And a small extra plus, the delta has a lit digital readout. :)

I was told the delta's fluid system is different then oconnor. so the delta doesn't leak as opposed to oconnor that supposedly could (but to be fair, the source of that bit of info came from the delta rep)

And one more major point: Delta has a 5 year warranty, everyone else has 2 year (If I'm wrong on this, please let me know).

Listed price of a 1030 head is $4790. The delta is listed at $5295. Only $500 difference. Since it's list price, I'm sure they can be gotten for cheaper.

Okay, so that's my tripod/head experience at NAB. It was admittedly a blur of reps, booths, and equipment! So, I'll be the first to say that I could have gotten things wrong on my info.

glad to hear it. I chose to go delta as well :)
 
Glad to hear both of you thought this. I was equally torn between those 2, as well. Both would work fine, I'm sure, so it may come down to which is a better price for me.

So...if you hear of any good deals on either, let me know.:greedy:
 
Thanks for the report. I have a Cartoni Gamma that has worked great for me for years. It will handle a BetaCam rigged with a full sized teleprompter with no problem at all. But, when I set a decked out RED on top of it, it "feels" like it is at the edge of its limits. It is rated to 35lbs, so it probably is loaded to all it can handle with my 20-120mm Angenieux, matte box, FF, LCD, battery and hard drive. So, I may have to look into a beefier head. Glad to know I can stay in the Cartoni family. The Gamma has been a workhorse.
 
Just to chime in here with my own experience...I have owned two O'Connor 1030B heads for over 10 years now...no leaks. I also have one of their first designed 1030's (the 'A' version?) , which has a simple O-Ring seal...and that one leaks. (I changed the seal and it is OK now) But...they soon changed that design to the current (I'm not sure of the actual design) seal, and I've heard that those that have the curent seal (in use now for many years) don't leak. So the Cartoni rep was probably referring to the original design not made now for over 10 years. They are all great heads, but here's what I did to make mine even better...I changed one of the three to a 150mm ball base (and modified the Sachtler Carbon Fiber tripod I have to the larger top casting (also 150mm of course). Absolutely HUGE difference in the weight of the camera it will take. I have been using it with an Arri 35-III now for several years (I need a light weight system for my kind of shooting), and with a 25-250mm lens (HR) it is quite adequate for me (I don't do a lot of beauty shots, although I do some and it works quite well)...the counter balance will handle it ( about 25 lbs), and I have a very light weight head and stix that I can carry into the wilds. The original 100mm ball would slip with the weight no matter how hard I tightened the ball.

I recently shot the opening for Showtime's Boxing coverage, and the producer picked up my head and stix for me and said...wow! that's the lightest setup he has grabbed...and we were shooting not just high
energy fighting shots, but some green screen stuff also...it worked very well for all. (Not to say that a 20-60, or 25-75 wouldn't be better for stage stuff (or certainly for long lens stuff)...I just like mine for quick setup changes, as long as I don't go too long on the lenses. (don't have to wait for the burly AC for help, which I do when I'm using a 25-75, Big Ronford stix, etc.)

Just my thoughts on it...I'm sure the Cartoni is aslo a great head...but for the weight of a fully configured Red and Zomm, etc, I would highly recommend the 150mm ball base.
 
BH also say the delta is 38 pounds...strange... I was looking at the master
series which is rated at 61 pounds I believe, has a mitchell base and is rock
solid but heavier. I looked at the sachtler cine 30 which I was able to get to
stay in any position I choose, I think company reps know alot about there
products but don't operate them everyday so they might not be as well versed in its operation as well as someone who uses it day to day.

Anybody from STE-MAN roaming these boards care to chime in about the Delta's true weight capacity?
 
I have the Cartoni USA price list from Ste-Man at NAB. The spec says 18-48lbs.
 
I bought a Delta head with 2 stage aluminum sticks from B&H for right at about $5k wit soft case. My DP loves it.

Mark Tyson
 
Has anybody tried the Cartoni C20 ?

I just had a talk with a Cartoni rep, in his opinion this head would be a better fit for the Red than the Delta.
It costs a bit more of course, is quite heavier (14 lbs vs 8 lbs for the delta), but has a wider weight range (up to 66 lbs).
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/188741-REG/Cartoni_S519_S519_C20S_Aluminum_Tripod.html

What do you think ?

I'll try to have a look and compare tomorrow.

Also, would you buy CF or aluminium sticks ?

Thanks,
Nils.
 
The Cartoni C20 handles the Red with an 18-100 Cooke well. I would recommend, unless there are special considerations, of going with the C20.
Thanks.
Actually, the only thing I don't like on the C20 is the weight, compared to a Delta.
Is it really worth the difference ? Has anybody compared these 2 tripods ?

CF sticks, unless a) you only shoot in studio b) have your own grip
Yes that's what I was thinking too, but I just checked, the weight difference seems to be minimal (about 1 lbs) compared to aluminium (not steel of course).
Also, the rep told me aluminium sticks are more resistant and much easier to repair than CF. And of course, there is a huge price difference between CF and aluminium...
 
personally, i couldn't find a reason to justify the cost of cf. i got the aluminum. carries the same weight.

the delta head satisfied the majority of my setups (red/mattebox/canon lenses or rented speeds) and shooting situations (small crew).
 
personally, i couldn't find a reason to justify the cost of cf. i got the aluminum. carries the same weight.

the delta head satisfied the majority of my setups (red/mattebox/canon lenses or rented speeds) and shooting situations (small crew).
Yes, that's what I'm thinking too.
I'll try to compare these setups tomorrow.
 
i haven't compared the c20, though. actually, i didn't know it existed. i thought the next step up was those studio monsters.

remember to also keep in consideration your lightest setup for red. the owner of ste-man was telling me that someone actually chose the gamma head over the delta because he thought he'd have trouble counterbalancing his lowest weight setup (maybe the just the red, lens, and power cord?). but the delta lowest weight is rated pretty low. if it was ever an issue for me, i thought i'd just shift the weight higher to compensate for the lower weight. so i'm thinking that the battery/drive positioned on top of the red, which is how i've seen setups, should solve any possible issues for me. haven't tried it yet. still waiting for back ordered accessories!!!
 
Back
Top