David Mullen ASC
Moderator
I could probably film it really quickly relatively speaking, compared to doing every angle of every scene, etc., just so in the editing room I can make decisions later. That's kind of the lazy approach in a way, lol.
Well, perhaps mentally lazy -- it sure isn't easy to shoot a lot of coverage...
I will say, though, that some of my favorite directors were known for shooting a lot of footage -- Kubrick, Wyler, Stevens, though Kubrick and Wyler didn't necessarily shoot a lot of angles, more just a lot of takes.
It does require budget and time though to be that indulgent. Kubrick's philosophy was to not be forced into making choices until the last possible moment, just in case something better came along. He wanted a lot of options at every stage in prep, production, and post, hence the long shoots and long posts. He wore everyone out in the process too. But it was a system that worked for him, though it is not necessarily condusive to low-budget filmmaking always. A better indie model is probably the b-movie film noir directors who only shot exactly what they needed and moved on. "Pithy" directing.