Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Milk Girls

I shot it with Jim, James and Brian, cut the sequence myself and i can tell you it wasnt fake.

If I could make fake look that good I would be pretty impressed with myself though.
 
Sounds vaguely familiar to photographic analysis of the moon landings... I'm waiting for someone to say that the whole sequence was actually shot with a DSLR while the girls moved in slow motion.. ;)
 
Sounds vaguely familiar to photographic analysis of the moon landings...
Click to expand...

The kind of photo analysis usually performed by people who have zero photographic knowledge yet trumpet normal photographic artifacts (such as shadow convergence) as though proof of conspiracy?

Or do you mean that this was shot in a warehouse in Arizona?
 
Jarred Land said:
I shot it with Jim, James and Brian, cut the sequence myself and i can tell you it wasnt fake.

If I could make fake look that good I would be pretty impressed with myself though.
Click to expand...

Jarred, one question that is intriguing me since I saw the footage,
where in CA do they have such milk bottles?
Last time I did see these bottles, were in Europe. They deliver milk to your doorsteps in these bottles early morning, like 4AM, in the wire-frame bottle containers, bottles banging against the wires making terrible noise and waking up all the people on the street.
The good thing is that if you are coming back from the party and you have hangover then you just grab the bottle from someone’s doorsteps and you can extinguish you thirst.
 
Well...I don't know that anyone was suggesting conspiracy. At least not in this thread.

I myself couldn't recall whether this was actually shot on a green screen or not. And from looking at it several people wondered. But I for one am happy to accept that it was in fact shot on a lot! :-) I pointed out the shadow because on my own (non-HD) monitor, the shadow looked "different" from what I was used to (viewing DVD's of Hollywood movies or my own truly exceptional SD footage (ack!)) and I was trying to figure out if it's because the images that 4K produces will have a certain look that I may or may not have to mitigate, or whether some compositing had resulted in the effect.

jtm said:
The kind of photo analysis usually performed by people who have zero photographic knowledge yet trumpet normal photographic artifacts (such as shadow convergence) as though proof of conspiracy?
Click to expand...

Okay, I can't resist. I assume this is directed at me, the dude who re-opened this thread to ask a question about the image. All I can say is, as someone spending a lot of money on a new camera, and tackling a very steep learning curve with obsessive conviction, I will continue to ask a lot of questions. I'll even ask stupid questions. And I'd say I have considerably more than zero photographic knowledge. However, considerably less knowledge than Jarred Land has about cameras, considerably less knowledge than Graeme Nattress has about bit depth and algorithms, and considerably less knowledge than Evin Grant has about lenses. That's why I spend too much time on RedUser.
 
My only two cents... if it WAS shot on green screen (it wasn't), wouldn't you really want the camera that could do that good of job? I would! Oh, wait, it's the RED...
 
Jarred Land said:
I shot it with Jim, James and Brian, cut the sequence myself and i can tell you it wasnt fake.

If I could make fake look that good I would be pretty impressed with myself though.
Click to expand...

Hello Jarred,

Were the lactos babes shot with the Red 300mm? Looks like lots of compression in that shot.

Chuck
 
If you guys get thrilled with this kind of thread, wait until you check the one called "Strobe".
Now that's a real thread for real men with real concerns about a real camera:detective2:

You're being nice kids though:meh:

"Just kidding" Emmanuel
 
To claim it was shot on a greenscreen would actually be a credit to Red. Either a yes or no answer is a good answer. So the real question is, was the Red camera somehow used in the moon landing because whether or not it was real or greenscreen, it sure worked! Red team, are you using alien technology?
Ronnie
 
chuck colburn said:
Hello Jarred,

Were the lactos babes shot with the Red 300mm? Looks like lots of compression in that shot.

Chuck
Click to expand...
Yes it was shot with the RED 300mm. Hard reflectors (2) were used for edge lighting and fill was used... don't remember if hmi's were used... this from memory and per Jim and Jarred. I cannot wait... here is to the upcoming price list!
 
Is there any chance that we'll be able to download this (or another sample) at > 1080p at some point?
 
Am I missing something? The highest quality video I see there is 1080p.
 
If you come down to NAB you can see footage 4K projected in our booth!
 
I sure hope we can get some >1080p footage posted online at or after NAB. Some of us would love nothing more than to come to NAB and see it in person, but I have a family commitment for mid-April that I can't escape from. I've tried everything and I'm starting to accept that NAB for me isn't going to happen this year. On the bright side, I save a bit of money to spend on more RED accessories. :w00t:

But there's people in my area who will have RED before me, so i'll be able to check it all out before mine is ready to ship.
 
Like Jim andd the team, I'm having a new kid around NAB.
I guess there are more of us who are longing to have go @ some real testfooty, but then again we probably will very soon when people start to get their cameras and the beta-software is online.

Really waiting for a new full circle of:
"Film is dead" and "watch this" threads.
It's only a year ago that the HVX was released...

Sorry for the link Jun-Dai, misread your question.

Gunleik
 
high resolutions online?

high resolutions online?

Jun-Dai said:
Is there any chance that we'll be able to download this (or another sample) at > 1080p at some point?
Click to expand...

What format does one use for download of video resolutions higher than 1920x1080? And what system do you need to play that back smoothly? This isn't a rhetorical question, I really don't know. Has anyone done that before?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top