Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

SAS Raid enclosures

Jarek Zabczynski

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 3, 2007
Messages
2,410
Reaction score
4
Points
38
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.jarek.com
Just picked up a current 12core MacPro...don't need to be a guinea pig on the iTube.

Planning out my new storage options. Atto 680 card seems to be a popular choice.

Not sure what unit to get for it though. Looking in the 8bay 8-16TB area. Likely running RAID5 unless someone can sell me on RAID6, I keep pretty healthy backup habits.
 
that's 150-175 MB/s... not so fast... They're stating 1000 MB/s in a Raid 5 config...

did u try other Raid configurations on the Rentaraid ?

We didn't, went straight in at Raid6; not sure what you mean about the 150-175 speed?
 
We didn't, went straight in at Raid6; not sure what you mean about the 150-175 speed?

Alex,

you posted "1200-1400Mb/s" which refers to Megabit/s, which equals 150-175 MB/s which refers to Megabyte/s... (1 byte = 8 bit)

Did you mean 1200-1400 Megabyte/s (MB/s) ?

if it was Mb/s then these numbers are not impressive, if it was MB/s then that would be blazing fast... ;-)))

one of the images on the product page shows a speed test with an AJA card coming in at 1000 MB/s read and write... now those are manufacturer test number probably in a perfect world scenario...

so feedback from real world users like you is very informative !

Thanks.

- Mike
 
Raid6 is better than raid5 once you start dealing with larger sets of raid drives, like 16 or 96 drive rack mounts, but since space is a concern with 4 and 8 drive raids it's usually better to go with raid5, or even raid0 with SSD raids. From what I understand SSDs suffer excessive wear in raid5/6 configurations.
 
Whether using SAS or eSATA or even USB3 for I/O, what is the current reality of RAIDing SSDs?

I've been told by people in the storage biz that SSD based RAIDs are still too unreliable.

Does anyone using SSD based RAIDs care to dispute that?

Cheers - #19
 
www.proavio.com

I have about 128TB of storage from them. about 1500MB/s
 
Alex,

you posted "1200-1400Mb/s" which refers to Megabit/s, which equals 150-175 MB/s which refers to Megabyte/s... (1 byte = 8 bit)

Did you mean 1200-1400 Megabyte/s (MB/s) ?

if it was Mb/s then these numbers are not impressive, if it was MB/s then that would be blazing fast... ;-)))

one of the images on the product page shows a speed test with an AJA card coming in at 1000 MB/s read and write... now those are manufacturer test number probably in a perfect world scenario...

so feedback from real world users like you is very informative !

Thanks.

- Mike

I'm mixing my Mb/s and MB/s it seems, I meant Megabyte/s (MB/s), so we're getting excess of what the Aja test from the manufacturer is showing (based on the Aja test run on our side).

We've got a PCI SSD which the Raid keeps pace with, I was expecting the Raid to be quick, but not that fast!

We went with Raid6 over Raid5, just for peace of mind really
 
I'm mixing my Mb/s and MB/s it seems, I meant Megabyte/s (MB/s), so we're getting excess of what the Aja test from the manufacturer is showing (based on the Aja test run on our side).

We've got a PCI SSD which the Raid keeps pace with, I was expecting the Raid to be quick, but not that fast!

We went with Raid6 over Raid5, just for peace of mind really

yeah, I figured it was a typo ;-)

looking into the Proavio...
 
Back
Top