Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Teradek WiFi link feedback

David Rasberry

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
0
Points
0
for any redusers that are using Teradek Cube wireless WiFi links for monitoring. I need some real world feedback on performance for a potential project.
1. Is there noticeable latency? How many frames approximately?
2. What is the typical line of sight range you are experiencing?
3. Are you using a separate wireless access point, router or switch for repeating or distribution?

Thanks in advance for any replies.
 
If you have a choice, go with another option. I never had a shoot with a 100% working teradeck.
Sometimes, over 3sec latency, sometimes crashing. Plus powering the router is a pain and not fit for a shoot location.
 
I own a Teradek Cube 155. It works great as a director's wireless monitor.

1. 1 frame latency
2. 75' until it starts to get choppy. The director I use this with is usually walking alongside the camera though for Steadicam or HH shots
3. No router used

I would note that when changing the camera's battery, it is necessary to reboot the Cube to get it up and running again, approx. 1 minute and 50 seconds. I told Teradek of this problem during Cinegear and they said it would be fixed with the new firmware update. Have yet to try it out.
 
I own the latest Cube (155) and agree with Bernard. However, it's important to note that you'll have to setup a wireless network in order to connect multiple devices (iPads). We tried that out and it worked beautifully. If I recall correctly, it's advised to use any channel above 11 (5Ghz range) in order to get the best performance.
 
Thanks for the replies guys.
I am evaluating upgrade alternatives to an old C-band microwave wireless NTSC camera system for a baseball stadium. Those have about a 10 frame latency as they are currently working. Sounds like it boils down to properly configuring a wireless network to meet range and quality of service requirements.
We have dealt with similar issues for networked video transmission in distance learning and end point wireless distribution to devices like iPads. 1 frame latency would be stellar if we can make it work.
 
Back
Top