Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

House of Cards dir. David Fincher

Olga Alimova

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Points
0
bal-pictures-first-look-at-house-of-cards-2012-012.jpg
bal-pictures-first-look-at-house-of-cards-2012-008.jpg

There is some sneek-peek footage from Baltimore's set of upcomong Netflix's $100+mln series. I suppose it will be most expensive TV\Web series in history, and one more "Shot on RED Epic" feature to list: http://www.baltimoresun.com/enterta...house-of-cards-20120426,0,876487.photogallery
Looks like they are first happy RED 9" LCD users.

bal-pictures-first-look-at-house-of-cards-2012-005.jpg
Havre de Grace gets the Hollywood treatment 70323840.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yes, the BBC version was indeed excellent and I'm very much looking forwards to seeing what Fincher does with it.

Graeme
 
Yes, House of Cards by the BBC was indeed excellent.

I look forward to the Fincher version as well.
 
Is the industry so afraid of unproven, new ideas that we have to recycle old ones?
Actually, the industry is setup in a way now that a lot of the tools of the trade are accessible to many, and it could be argued that if one wants to invoke new ideas, fresh perspectives into motion pictures then by all means there's nothing really stopping you - except of course money and distribution. Which is why you see a lot of recycling because the studios often put the money into the tried and true because in some ways it's less risky. But aside from money, nothing stopping an explosion of new ideas from independent filmmakers. Finding a truly original idea, one so unique that an audience feels they are watching something they have never seen before, have no basis for comparison is indeed rare these days because we are over 100 years into the history of filmmaking. There have been thousands upon thousands of films, many of which follow a predictable, although proven structure. And being unique and so far out of the norm doesn't guarantee there is an audience willing to watch it either. But I think new voices will surface, perhaps movie structure will also evolve eventually. Having said all that, I don't think a remake is an automatic dud. There have been some successful remakes. And in this case, with a talented filmmaker like Fincher there is a good chance for success.
 
I don't think it's "afraid" so much as easier to pitch in a boardroom full of nervy executives looking for a surefire hit. No-one wants to spend a dollar and make two these days - they want to spend a dollar and make a billion. Everything's got to be a home run or all those executive producers don't get asked back to the party again. Thus begins the dimwitted chase for the surefire hit - leading to mediocrity and committee-think. Most of the target audience for 21 Jump Street wouldn't have even seen it but some of the executives might have. Further, that the idea was already commercially successful at one time means that it has a chance of being successful again. Simple uncomplicated maths. To them it's a can of beans - a product. As Gordon Gecko says "Don't get emotional about stock". End of (retold) story.

Chris Nolan said he thought the hardest battle would have been getting Memento made - as it turned out, finding someone to distribute it turned out to be far tougher. Everyone who saw it loved it but couldn't market it. The film was picked up by a smaller company than they hoped for who happened to love it personally. Then Stephen Soderbergh saw it and lauded it every chance he got whilst promoting his own film. As Nolan said, he owes the success of Memento to Soderbergh - and perhaps by extension his career that followed it.

Even so called "original" movies seem like remakes these days - Battleship is clearly equal parts Top Gun, Transformers and Independence day. All hugely financially successful movies. Lob a few handsome/pretty inoffensive actors at it (maybe a current singer to pull in the girls), blare rock music every time the film seems to lag for a trillionth of a second and several million dollars worth of visual effects linked up with the Transformers sound effects library. Script optional. Viola! The movie pitches itself.
 
Ha - my girlfriend lives like a block away from there. Every once in a while, I walk by and see the trucks and crew and equipment, and then - envy.
 
Back
Top