Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Leica Elmarit-R 28mm 1:2.8 a shot description

Sanjin Jukic

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
8,929
Reaction score
1
Points
36
Location
Vienna, Austria
Website
www.sanjinjukic.com
Here is Leica Elmarit-R 28mm 1:2.8 a shot description shooting guide:

"Artistic considerations

For the 28mm and for the 35mm lens the well-known phrase by
Robert Capa is valid: "If your picture isn’t good enough, you
weren’t close enough". Often a wide angle lens is used just to
get more information on the negative. But the problems with
composition grow disproportionally. If you cram too much into
the frame, it is difficult to get a clear and simple composition.
And the subjects will become small details behind an empty
foreground. The 35mm perspective is only efficient if the subject
is almost touchable. With the 28mm this effect is even
more pronounced. Here one should literally be close to the
skin. Wide angle lenses are often employed for landscapes,
interiors, and buildings. In these cases one should stop down to
get very sharp pictures as it is the crispness of the details that
tells the story. The true domain of the moderate wide angles is
the reportage or documentary snapshot at closer distances.
The large depth of field will help to cover up slight unsharpness
due to errors in focusing. The photographic challenge is the
figure-ground relationship and the size relation between backand
foreground subjects. The details in the background are
very small and because there are so many details (due to the
field angle) the background can be very distracting. It is simpler
to take a good picture with a 90mm than with a 28mm. Therefore
you should be close to the main subject and let the surroundings
support your statement with good choice of detail and
structure.

Conclusion

These 28 and 35mm lenses are eminently suited for the spontaneous
snapshot and for the more formal artistic pictures. In
any case one should start with pictures of subjects not farther
away from the camera than 3m. Close range photography is the
best approach to start with. In this range you can learn to see
and study the wide angle effects. In fact you can photograph
almost everything with these lenses. The most important thing
is the style of language of your photography. The play with the
depth of field and the size relationships in fore- and bakkground
are the decisive factors here for a good or bad image.
The lenses can only be the means to an end.

The Elmarit-R 28mm f/2.8 is a challenge
for photographers who need the best possible
definition in their style of photography. The lenses with
focal lengths of 28mm and 35mm belong to the group of classical
focal lengths of the 35mm-format’s tradition."


Erwin Puts LINK>>>

elmar28mm-ukjackbear1.jpg

Leica Elmarit-R 28mm 1:2.8 at wide open 2.8, ISO 320, shutter speed 1/50 sec on Canon 40D.

elmar28mm_ukjackbear2.jpg

Leica Elmarit-R 28mm 1:2.8 at f/4, ISO 320, shutter speed 1/50 sec on Canon 40D.

elmar28mm_ukjackbear3.jpg

Leica Elmarit-R 28mm 1:2.8 at f/4, ISO 320, shutter speed 1/50 sec on Canon 40D.

elmar28mm_leicashop.jpg

Leica Elmarit-R 28mm 1:2.8 at wide open 2.8, ISO320, shutter speed 1/50 sec on Canon 40D.
 
Continue

Continue

elmar28mm_gerngross.jpg

Leica Elmarit-R 28mm 1:2.8 at f/8, ISO 320, shutter speed 1/50 sec on Canon 40D.

elmar28mm_karlskirche.jpg

Leica Elmarit-R 28mm 1:2.8 at f/11, ISO 320, shutter speed 1/50 sec on Canon 40D.

elmarit28mm_cafesperl.jpg

Leica Elmarit-R 28mm 1:2.8 at f/8, ISO 320, shutter speed 1/50 sec on Canon 40D.


elmarit28mm_canon40D.jpg

Leica Elmarit-R 28mm 1:2.8 on Canon 40D.
Shot on Nikon D50 with AF-S Nikkor 17-35mm 1:2.8 D at 22mm, ISO 360, shutter speed 1/60 at f/2.8, flash fired, manual focus.
 
12781_4.jpg

Leica Elmarit-R 2,8/28mm, production year: 1980, used, price: EURO 390 or about US $ 560.
 
Nice work Sanjin, I'll dedicate a glass of my Palazzone Brunello to you tonight, thanks...
 
For me Leica is definitely better then Zeiss.

It's always sharper in all corners, warmer, with a natural color rendition and a bit of 3D spatial feeling.
 
I was looking for a review on google about the Leica R 28mm elmarit Non aspherical and I found that old thread.
Ha ha, Sanjin, Leica should give you some free lenses for your devotion.
So the version 1 isn't that bad, I have an offer for one and was esitating.
Their is no photos to illustrate anymore, but your words are already a positive argument for the seller.
Best
B.
 
Nice pic Matt really 70's look.
I read here and there that version 1 of the 28 is a bit soft on the borders and easy to flare.
What did you noticed?
Best
B.
 
I've not done side by side, with the V2. A friend of mine has one but he's in Portland and I'm in LA... Best of intentions to go up there
this summer and I'll try to do a side by side.

I think The Leica R's are the pick of the litter for manual iris, manual focus stills glass.
You can find newer lenses that are more flare resistant but you'll loose the iris ring and smooth solid focus.
There's a bit of special "leica look" there - a useful amount of contrast, good resolution, good color and
a smooth way of handling the in focus to out of focus transitions.

If high center to edge resolution and flare resitance is your priority probably the R's not the best choice... Modern top of the line Nikkor's might be...
or of course Zeiss Ultra and Master's.

Matt Uhry
www.mattuhry.com
 
The flare isn't a issu for me, and I love Leica R lenses.
I was esitating on the 28 because it's a focal I don't use a lot and was wondering if it's worth it.
I haven't been disapointed by the R lenses I picked since I started collecting my Leica set.
The 28 is the missing piece in the set, I think you answered to my questions.
thanks Matt
Best
brice
 
Back
Top