Dragon poll

[Gunleik Groven]

So what do you want from your dragon?

 

[Scott Crawley]

1. Dynamic range
2. Improved frame rates for HDRX (Scarlet)
3. 50-100 FPS @4k would be nice. Tertiary, but nice.

 

[Jon Carr]

800 or more base ISO
Much better highlight protection
5k in 24 (scarlet)

 

[Gunleik Groven]

ACtually forgot:
I don't care, as long as the de-encryption and debayering gets less computer intensive...

 

[Scott Crawley]

ACtually forgot:
I don't care, as long as the de-encryption and debayering gets less computer intensive...

In camera processing has an impact on this? Much?

 

[Gunleik Groven]

In camera processing has an impact on this? Much?

Towards "Not so much"

Makes post smoother?
A lot...

 

[Zeb B]

1280 native ISO and more DR knowing that, if this update is to ship this year, the design has been locked out - it's a production/testing project now. It is what it is and I'm sure it will be solid

 

[Christopher Barrett]

Breathe fire and devour maidens?

 

[Kitersfa]

Native ISO at 1280 would be really nice…if it was 1600 I'd sell a kidney for it

 

[BRANDON JAMESON]

as far as poles go..i always seem to prefer stripper.

 

[Jon Carr]

as far as poles go..i always seem to prefer stripper.

Gotta pay for the dragon somehow....

 

[Scott Crawley]

as far as poles go..i always seem to prefer stripper.

I prefer strippers too, but they needn't be Polish. What's so special about Polish strippers? Are they extra hot?
:ihih:

 

[Gunleik Groven]

I should have put in a night at a Vgas Strip-joint as one option.
And another unmentionable camera as B-cam as one more.

But I think the poll is pretty good as it is...

 

[Peter Stelzhammer]

depending on the weather situation and lenses/matte boxes used, fiddling around with ND's can be quite a pain (if you have to be fast)… not to speak of possible IR pollution if you don't take care or have the wrong filters… user-error - I know. But if a new sensor or OLPF or whatever in front of the sensor will make it easier for me - count me in!

 

[Gunleik Groven]

depending on the weather situation and lenses/matte boxes used, fiddling around with ND's can be quite a pain (if you have to be fast)… not to speak of possible IR pollution if you don't take care or have the wrong filters… user-error - I know. But if a new sensor or OLPF or whatever in front of the sensor will make it easier for me - count me in!

Thus you, like me, will rather want the capacity of seeing in the light, than seing in the dark.

I'd love to skip an ND .9 when I go out...

Cuz that's where we usually start...

 

[Gunleik Groven]

Kinda impressed with how many users who don't use lights....

 

[Scott Crawley]

Kinda impressed with how many users who don't use lights....

interesting choice of words...

 

[Michael Totten]

Range in the highlights.

 

[Elsie N]

I really want most of all, the ability of the dragon to match the MX. I have two cameras and would like to only upgrade one if the footage from each will co-mingle with the other. Eventually I would like to have both upgraded, but early on I might skip upgrading just one until I can have both done. I will almost always use both together so this is important to me.

 

[Gunleik Groven]

interesting choice of words...

Quite delberate, have to admit...
I cannot feel oldchool, as RED was my way into highend productions... That'd be too absurd!
But still the ability to shape light was and is a huge part of what I consider photography. Not the ability to do stuff without light.

But this is one of the many and funny anachronisms of life!