benedictspence
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2007
- Messages
- 113
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Dear RED dudes,
I'm having a bit of a dilemma here regarding my purchase of an Epic-X and I'd really like some advice from the smart people at RED. I've owned my Red One for 3 years now, it's been a great camera to me. I've used it myself on some fantastic projects and I've earned money from dry hiring it. It was the first professional camera I ever bought and I still love it. I signed up for an Epic-X, stage 2... Brilliantly excited about all the features it was going to bring. Like everyone (RED foremost I'm sure) I was frustrated by the delays. When the Epic-M was announced I knew I had to buy one, firstly to get on the ground floor of the Epic program, not knowing when the delays would end for the Epic-X, secondly and most importantly it was so that I could compete with all those big facilities companies and individuals who were now buying Epic-M's but had not owned a Red One. I absolutely understand RED's position on the Epic-M, I truly do, but the fact is it has allowed many companies and people to skip "the queue". This is not a criticism, just an observation.
Now I have the problem of soon needing to purchase an Epic-X. With the best will in the world I don't think that I need the Epic-X, certainly not while keeping my Red One and having the Epic-M. However my fear is that if I don't go ahead with my purchase I'll loose my place in "the queue" forever, even though I am a Red One owner and and Epic-M owner. I'm not one of the true RED pioneers but I have been a good customer over the years. I have asked to downgrade from Stage 2 to Stage 3, but I have been told no. I'd love to keep my Red One but the fact is, even though it is still a great camera it will fall out of popularity once the Epic-X's are in the wild and it makes little financial sense for me as an owner/operator to keep it. I wish I could run my business on being sentimental (I'd still have my Canon XL-1 if I did!) but especially in this climate I have better things to spend the £20,000 which a kitted out Stage 2 Epic X would cost me when I already have a Red One and a Epic-M.
Then to make matters more interesting are the most recent announcements from Jim about no more discussion of future products until they are ready to ship. Again I totally understand RED's reasons for doing this. However with RED's move to mass produced cameras, which aren't announced until they are ready to ship, does this mean the days of year long waiting lists for cameras and having your place in "the queue" are a thing of the past for RED?
To conclude... I've been told by RED that I cannot downgrade to Stage 3 from Stage 2. Due to my ownership of an Epic-M already, I believe it would be against the best interests of my business to own a Stage 2 Epic-X (therefore having 3 cameras). The thing I'm worrying about is that I will loose my place in "the queue" if I give up my stage 2 Epic-X, even though I've been a loyal Red customer and purchaser of an Epic-M. Or now with large scale production lines and no news until products are ready to ship does "the queue" not matter any more? Should I be punished by loosing my place in the queue even though I bought and Epic-M?
My ideal situation would be to transfer my place in "the queue" to my Epic-M, but I expect that is unlikely.
There is no angry edge to this letter; I'm a big fan of RED, they've shaken up the industry fantastically and produced some amazing cameras. I'm sure they don't want to micromanage every customers business model but I'd love to know what their thoughts are on this.....
Regards,
Ben Spence
I'm having a bit of a dilemma here regarding my purchase of an Epic-X and I'd really like some advice from the smart people at RED. I've owned my Red One for 3 years now, it's been a great camera to me. I've used it myself on some fantastic projects and I've earned money from dry hiring it. It was the first professional camera I ever bought and I still love it. I signed up for an Epic-X, stage 2... Brilliantly excited about all the features it was going to bring. Like everyone (RED foremost I'm sure) I was frustrated by the delays. When the Epic-M was announced I knew I had to buy one, firstly to get on the ground floor of the Epic program, not knowing when the delays would end for the Epic-X, secondly and most importantly it was so that I could compete with all those big facilities companies and individuals who were now buying Epic-M's but had not owned a Red One. I absolutely understand RED's position on the Epic-M, I truly do, but the fact is it has allowed many companies and people to skip "the queue". This is not a criticism, just an observation.
Now I have the problem of soon needing to purchase an Epic-X. With the best will in the world I don't think that I need the Epic-X, certainly not while keeping my Red One and having the Epic-M. However my fear is that if I don't go ahead with my purchase I'll loose my place in "the queue" forever, even though I am a Red One owner and and Epic-M owner. I'm not one of the true RED pioneers but I have been a good customer over the years. I have asked to downgrade from Stage 2 to Stage 3, but I have been told no. I'd love to keep my Red One but the fact is, even though it is still a great camera it will fall out of popularity once the Epic-X's are in the wild and it makes little financial sense for me as an owner/operator to keep it. I wish I could run my business on being sentimental (I'd still have my Canon XL-1 if I did!) but especially in this climate I have better things to spend the £20,000 which a kitted out Stage 2 Epic X would cost me when I already have a Red One and a Epic-M.
Then to make matters more interesting are the most recent announcements from Jim about no more discussion of future products until they are ready to ship. Again I totally understand RED's reasons for doing this. However with RED's move to mass produced cameras, which aren't announced until they are ready to ship, does this mean the days of year long waiting lists for cameras and having your place in "the queue" are a thing of the past for RED?
To conclude... I've been told by RED that I cannot downgrade to Stage 3 from Stage 2. Due to my ownership of an Epic-M already, I believe it would be against the best interests of my business to own a Stage 2 Epic-X (therefore having 3 cameras). The thing I'm worrying about is that I will loose my place in "the queue" if I give up my stage 2 Epic-X, even though I've been a loyal Red customer and purchaser of an Epic-M. Or now with large scale production lines and no news until products are ready to ship does "the queue" not matter any more? Should I be punished by loosing my place in the queue even though I bought and Epic-M?
My ideal situation would be to transfer my place in "the queue" to my Epic-M, but I expect that is unlikely.
There is no angry edge to this letter; I'm a big fan of RED, they've shaken up the industry fantastically and produced some amazing cameras. I'm sure they don't want to micromanage every customers business model but I'd love to know what their thoughts are on this.....
Regards,
Ben Spence