Sam Eilertsen
Well-known member
So, I've heard a lot about the "crop factor" on lenses when shooting on cameras like the R1 or the 7D which do not have FF35 sensors. In particular, I've heard people describe a 30mm lens as the "equivalent" of a 50mm, the 50 as the equivalent of the 85, etc, when shooting with an APS-C sized camera.
This confuses me when talking about video. An APS-C camera may have a 1.5x crop relative to an FF35. However, motion picture film itself is not FF35 sized, the R1 is designed to be similar in coverage to Super35, and the 7D is only a little smaller.
So, my question is, am I right in my conclusion that if I use a 50mm on an APS-C camera, in terms of the effects of focal length (compression of space, bokeh, etc), it will be fairly similar to using a 50 on a 35mm film camera, whereas if I use it on say the 5D, it will actually look wider than it would on film?
Thanks!
This confuses me when talking about video. An APS-C camera may have a 1.5x crop relative to an FF35. However, motion picture film itself is not FF35 sized, the R1 is designed to be similar in coverage to Super35, and the 7D is only a little smaller.
So, my question is, am I right in my conclusion that if I use a 50mm on an APS-C camera, in terms of the effects of focal length (compression of space, bokeh, etc), it will be fairly similar to using a 50 on a 35mm film camera, whereas if I use it on say the 5D, it will actually look wider than it would on film?
Thanks!