![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 127
|
This is just a matter of curiousity more than anything. Why are the RPP, or any cine lenses for that matter, so significantly larger than their photo counterparts?
Is this because Cine lenses are attempting to minimize breathing and distortion and thus require larger elements and housings? Example, the Nikon 50mm f1.4 weighs 9.9oz and has a 58mm filter. The 50mm T1.8 RPP is 4.53 lbs and has a 110mm front element. Why so big? KO |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
|
Part of it is optics and part is mechanics. Ever since the Primos and S4s came out ACs have become very fond of large barreled lenses with the long (read accurate) focus throws they afford.
Also more size and weight mean more correction for optical aberrations like CA and coma. As well as breathing. To make the lenses perform as well and be light you'd need extremely sophisticated hybrid aspherical elements. That's reasonable in a 500,000-1M unit production like Nikon or Canon produce, but much less so in a low volume (under 10K) run like the RPPS. And in most situations the cam is already lighter than an equivalent 35mm film cam so you can afford the weight/performance trade off. A good comparison is either the Duclos/Tokina 11-16 or Focus Optics/Nikon 14-24. Both offer very high optical quality by leveraging the mass produced but very modern (aspherical) designs of the still lenses they are based on, but do not have as long a focus throw as the RPPs.
__________________
"All art is deception." My DP reel... http://www.evingrantdp.com 360º Cinematography and camera rigs... http://www.360dop.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 801
|
Another thought - it is sometimes desirable to have both focus and iris motor-controlled. There is a certain minimum size to accommodate two motors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
|
That is less of an issue, My standard speed Zeiss lenses can take two motors and they are about the same size as a still prime.
__________________
"All art is deception." My DP reel... http://www.evingrantdp.com 360º Cinematography and camera rigs... http://www.360dop.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 127
|
interesting. yeah it makes sense, it's still amazing to me that the Nikon primes are so small and deliver some great results. Either way, I can't afford any RPPs. Hopefully the Mini-Primes will be quite economical.
KO |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,465
|
Also keep in mind Cine primes and zooms are made to be serviced and have a very long life compared to still lenses. With serviceability comes size.
__________________
_mike "One for a meal, One for the reel, or One to learn something" |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
|
The larger diameter of the lens helps for more focus travel as well as more room for printing scales with much more markings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 127
|
With more focus 'travel' then comes more precision? Meaning a 1/4" of rotation on a cine lens is less sensitive compared to a photo lens and thus allows more precision. That is a good thing, for sure.
KO |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,535
|
The RPPs are anchors!! Especially the 25 and 35..
__________________
Red 363 'MX Feb 19' Canon PL K-35 Superspeeds cin / edi / dir www.rickdarge.com http://www.theredshooter.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 436
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|