REDUSER.net

Go Back   REDUSER.net > Shooting RED > Lens Tests

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-11-2009, 01:40 AM   #1
Kevin Olsen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 198
Default Lens Size, Why so Big?

This is just a matter of curiousity more than anything. Why are the RPP, or any cine lenses for that matter, so significantly larger than their photo counterparts?

Is this because Cine lenses are attempting to minimize breathing and distortion and thus require larger elements and housings?

Example, the Nikon 50mm f1.4 weighs 9.9oz and has a 58mm filter. The 50mm T1.8 RPP is 4.53 lbs and has a 110mm front element. Why so big?

KO
Kevin Olsen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 02:28 AM   #2
Evin Grant
Moderator
 
Evin Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,137
Send a message via AIM to Evin Grant
Default

Part of it is optics and part is mechanics. Ever since the Primos and S4s came out ACs have become very fond of large barreled lenses with the long (read accurate) focus throws they afford.
Also more size and weight mean more correction for optical aberrations like CA and coma. As well as breathing. To make the lenses perform as well and be light you'd need extremely sophisticated hybrid aspherical elements. That's reasonable in a 500,000-1M unit production like Nikon or Canon produce, but much less so in a low volume (under 10K) run like the RPPS. And in most situations the cam is already lighter than an equivalent 35mm film cam so you can afford the weight/performance trade off. A good comparison is either the Duclos/Tokina 11-16 or Focus Optics/Nikon 14-24. Both offer very high optical quality by leveraging the mass produced but very modern (aspherical) designs of the still lenses they are based on, but do not have as long a focus throw as the RPPs.
__________________

"All art is deception."

My DP reel...
http://www.evingrantdp.com
http://www.YouTube.com/evingrant
360º Cinematography and camera rigs...
http://www.360dop.com
Evin Grant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 06:46 AM   #3
Charles Angus
Senior Member
 
Charles Angus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 948
Default

Another thought - it is sometimes desirable to have both focus and iris motor-controlled. There is a certain minimum size to accommodate two motors.
__________________
Charles Angus Taylor
www.charlesangustaylor.com
Charles Angus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 08:48 AM   #4
Evin Grant
Moderator
 
Evin Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,137
Send a message via AIM to Evin Grant
Default

That is less of an issue, My standard speed Zeiss lenses can take two motors and they are about the same size as a still prime.
__________________

"All art is deception."

My DP reel...
http://www.evingrantdp.com
http://www.YouTube.com/evingrant
360º Cinematography and camera rigs...
http://www.360dop.com
Evin Grant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 03:57 PM   #5
Kevin Olsen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 198
Default

interesting. yeah it makes sense, it's still amazing to me that the Nikon primes are so small and deliver some great results. Either way, I can't afford any RPPs. Hopefully the Mini-Primes will be quite economical.

KO
Kevin Olsen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 07:03 PM   #6
Mike Prevette
Senior Member
 
Mike Prevette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,553
Default

Also keep in mind Cine primes and zooms are made to be serviced and have a very long life compared to still lenses. With serviceability comes size.
__________________
_mike

"One for a meal, One for the reel, or One to learn something"
Mike Prevette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 07:27 PM   #7
Steve Gal
Senior Member
 
Steve Gal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 507
Send a message via AIM to Steve Gal
Default

The larger diameter of the lens helps for more focus travel as well as more room for printing scales with much more markings.
__________________
Steve Gal
Du-All Camera
http://www.duallcamera.com
Steve Gal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2009, 11:52 PM   #8
Kevin Olsen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 198
Default

With more focus 'travel' then comes more precision? Meaning a 1/4" of rotation on a cine lens is less sensitive compared to a photo lens and thus allows more precision. That is a good thing, for sure.

KO
Kevin Olsen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 04:02 AM   #9
Rick Darge
Senior Member
 
Rick Darge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,089
Default

The RPPs are anchors!! Especially the 25 and 35..
__________________
This was my signature
Rick Darge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 08:14 PM   #10
Mark Pedersen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Darge View Post
The RPPs are anchors!! Especially the 25 and 35..
Which is a pain when you are hand holding, since you typically use a wider lens.

M
Mark Pedersen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:39 AM.


All Content Copyright Landmine Media, Inc. 2010