![]() |
|
|
#351 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,494
|
Quote:
__________________
Kind regards, Tim Whitcomb/Founder INDENT STUDIOS (2) RED ONE "M-X" Packages RED Pro Primes, RED Rocket Quantel Pablo 4K w/NEO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#352 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 73
|
Isn't that like $2500... yeah I think not I understand post and everything I just wanted a breakdown of what the settings are going to do when I input the into the camera...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#353 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Snowcapped Highlands, Arizona
Posts: 60
|
My favorite part of RED Day that I forgot to mention, Q&A was over, the Exit had been opened and people were huddling around the RED guys in the front to talk it up. While I was waiting to speak to Jim there was a german bloke who was showing Jim foreign film magazines that were trying to downplay RED's products and way of doing business as a 'religion'.
Jim laughed hard enough to warrant removing his cigar, threw up his arms and said: "What, it is a religion! Guilty as charged!" I managed to succeed in suppressing maniacal laughter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#354 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,687
|
Shawn, you've been right all along. Jim is talking about the way you interpret the RAW information (ISO) and the direction you might find yourself pushing the whole frame with "hard exposure tools".
To protect highlights you want to avoid clipping those hot areas, the only way to do that is with filters, closing your iris, or lowering (shorter) shutter speed. These hard tools change your recording, your RAW files. With Mysterium you could then bring up the shadows a lot before showing noise. With Mysterium-X you can bring up the shadows a heckuva' lot more before showing noise. That lets you "protect highlights" more, by allowing you to shoot darker with more filters, smaller T-Stops, and shorter shutters.
__________________
Writer - Director |
|
|
|
|
|
#355 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 100
|
Quote:
We are all eagerly awaiting! :) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#356 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,854
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#357 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,848
|
Quote:
I know there's a lot of MX excitement, but I was pretty thrilled with RED footage at RED day myself. (on another note - RED day was harried for me and I really didn't see as much as I wanted to. Later I found out footage I shot was showing at one of the booths and I never saw it. RED day needs to be longer. Dammit. LOL!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#358 | |
|
REDuser Sponsor
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 527
|
Quote:
Sure enough, it was Manure, the film I was fortunate enough to operate on with David Mullen ASC. Even though the movie was finished in 2k, they had re-rendered a few 4k clips there. So seeing it on the big screen with the Sony 4k projector - well, Ive never seen sh*t look so good.
__________________
Conrad Hunziker III Camera Operator, IATSE 600 Red Tech & R3D Data Manager Software author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#359 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK, East Anglia
Posts: 135
|
Quote:
Can you elaborate on what was mentioned on these fronts for those who weren't able to attend? __________________________________________ Quentin Brown. Camera Trainee RED DIT in training _ _ _ _ _ _ In a side note : I recently went to the broadcast Video expo in the UK and the Red was everywhere. Almost every major stand (apart from those run by other camera manufacturers of course) had one on it. Almost 1/4 of the seminars that could have covered it (i.e. the ones about post or production rather than commissioning and lighting) were entirely about it. Red has hit broadcast production in a big way if there was buzz about anything it was 3D and Red. Glad to see they are all catching on. Still a lot needs to be done to help them all understand it properly - and that's where I plan to come in! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|