The New World - Page 2

karapetkov · 11-13-2008, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by number6

My concern is not about the immediate future, but a hundred years from now. If Jannard is not here at that time, who's gonna build my "new idea" camera then?!

That's what keeps ME up at night.

I think you know something we don't. :)

number6 · 11-13-2008, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karapetkov

I think you know something we don't. :)

yes... I do.

Drew Suppa · 11-13-2008, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karapetkov

Jannard is the Columbus of digital cinema.

Not a good analogy; the Vikings landed in North America in 1100CE and before them the Mayans were so aware of the geography of the world that their wise men sailed to the Indian coast and studied Buddhism with Tibetan sages... and who can forget the Asians who crossed to Alaska on a land bridge in the Bering Strait during the last Ice Age 12,000 years ago.

Sorry... huge history buff.

It's kind of like saying Bill Gates invented computers. He just stole a lot of technology from other people and assembled it in new and amazing ways.

...Maybe it is a good analogy, on second thought, no offense to Jannard.

nick allsop · 11-13-2008, 01:38 PM

i am concerned about no PL mount above 5K. there are professional work flows for 2/3" lenses and PL mount lenses. i see the 9k to be like 65mm and the 28k to possibly be like imax, i see them as sfx and specialist cameras. but am not sure about 6k FF35. the lenses seem to be AF stills lenses. i know people have been shooting red footage with stills lenses, but it seems that the more expensive higher resolution camera will be using cheaper and less proven glass.
i'm concerned that there is now too much choice its all gonna get confusing.

Johann Schulz · 11-14-2008, 01:28 PM

PL mounts now available, but don't wish full resolution on top of it!

karapetkov · 11-14-2008, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suppatime

the Vikings

There was the DVX100, ya know. 24p and stuff.

Quote:

the Mayans were so aware of the geography

And the HVX200. :)

And Kodak got these thingies from a loooong time, but they weren't available and certainly not affordable.

Ya know? :bleh:

Quote:

Sorry... huge history buff.

You're forgiven.

And welcome to the club. ;)

Quote:

It's kind of like saying Bill Gates invented computers.

M-no, a Bulgarian-American did.

P.S. And Columbus was one lucky fuck! He was looking for India, for Christ's sake. Fortune favors the bold...

P.S. (nosey) Ya know? ::bleh:

11-14-2008, 01:28 PM	#15
Johann Schulz Registered User Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 287	PL mounts now available, but don't wish full resolution on top of it! __________________ Johann

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-13-2008, 01:38 PM	#14
nick allsop Registered User Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: London Posts: 117	i am concerned about no PL mount above 5K. there are professional work flows for 2/3" lenses and PL mount lenses. i see the 9k to be like 65mm and the 28k to possibly be like imax, i see them as sfx and specialist cameras. but am not sure about 6k FF35. the lenses seem to be AF stills lenses. i know people have been shooting red footage with stills lenses, but it seems that the more expensive higher resolution camera will be using cheaper and less proven glass. i'm concerned that there is now too much choice its all gonna get confusing.