Thread: Cooke 9-50mm T2.5

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by Martin View Post
    I think you'll find it is Optex which went down the pan, they did the conversion kits. As far as I know CinemaTechnic are still going strong.
    Ooops! Thanks for the correction Martin. :umm:
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    what is the length of this lens?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member Harry Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,625
    I have a mint 9-50 that I used for may years with my SR 1 and SR3 cameras. It's every bit as sharp as my Canon 7-63, and I think, flares less and in a more predictable way. Mine is Arri Bayo, so I use a PL adapter.
    I also think that since the 16:9 (or 1.78:1) shape is more rectangular than the 1.66:1 Super-16 aperture, that the vignetting on the corners will be masked when used with Red one. If that proves true, I may have mine overhauled and fitted with a PL mount.
    In any case, as you zoom in, in will cover at some point.
    A great lens. Focuses very close, NO breathing, rugged and serviceable Cooke product.
    I'll certainly make use of mine when light weight is more important than full 4K chip size (run-and-gun, 120 fps, etc.)
    Also, FYI: this lens was popular for a long time with tabletop TV commercial guys. Since it's so small and optically top-notch, we used to put a 2X extender and PL adapter on it to make it cover on a 35mm frame. Worked great! This was before probe lenses like the Revolution.
    Cheers,
    Harry
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts