Thread: Confrom From Hell - Done

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11  
    Quote Originally Posted by Offhollywood View Post
    Film was framed for 2:40 - shot in 4K 2:1.

    We will grade in 2:40 - master to HDCAM SR 2:40 letterboxed, then we will Pan & Scan to full frame 16x9 and 4x3 versions.
    Wouldn't it be a little better to make the 16x9 and 4x3 1080P HD versions from a 2:1 master, either 2K or 4K, or even 2:1 letterboxed on HDCAM-SR, rather than from a 2.40 letterboxed 1080P image?
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,628
    Quote Originally Posted by David Mullen ASC View Post
    Wouldn't it be a little better to make the 16x9 and 4x3 1080P HD versions from a 2:1 master, either 2K or 4K, or even 2:1 letterboxed on HDCAM-SR, rather than from a 2.40 letterboxed 1080P image?
    Exactly what I was going to suggest. Crop the 2:1 and blow up/panscan only what you must to lose extraneous items (mic booms, dolly track, etc.). I think you would find very little pan and scan to be necessary, unless they shot a lot of *very* wide compositions.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,051
    Darn impressive. Comforming in less than a day, it added the plus of Scratch and of course the capabilities of you, Offholywood !

    Congrats :weight_lift:
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    424
    Quote Originally Posted by David Mullen ASC View Post
    Wouldn't it be a little better to make the 16x9 and 4x3 1080P HD versions from a 2:1 master, either 2K or 4K, or even 2:1 letterboxed on HDCAM-SR, rather than from a 2.40 letterboxed 1080P image?
    Just a thought but if it's framed 2.40:1 it may have mike down to
    the top of frame, requiring Mark to Pan & Scan, .......naughty boys.
    mezmo
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Quote Originally Posted by David Mullen ASC View Post
    Wouldn't it be a little better to make the 16x9 and 4x3 1080P HD versions from a 2:1 master, either 2K or 4K, or even 2:1 letterboxed on HDCAM-SR, rather than from a 2.40 letterboxed 1080P image?
    16 x 9 and 4 x3 are both all made from the 4K RAW file.

    I should not have said "master" - what I mean was that the 2:40 was the "hero" version.

    We then just pan & scan in Scratch - always working from from the 4K RAW files -
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Quote Originally Posted by mezmo View Post
    Just a thought but if it's framed 2.40:1 it may have mike down to
    the top of frame, requiring Mark to Pan & Scan, .......naughty boys.
    mezmo
    I always tell filmmakers to protect the entire image sensor whenever possible. No, we don't have any booms in the 4K 2:1.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts