Thread: Adobe Encore - image unsexily sharp in Blu-Ray build

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1 Adobe Encore - image unsexily sharp in Blu-Ray build 
    Junior Member aemilia scott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    27
    Hi All,

    I'm working on a film festival submission (For my short Best If Used By... maybe you saw the teaser at the Red Open House in February), and I'm authoring a blu-ray for one such festival.

    The blu-ray, as played on two different TVs, is like eye-bleedingly sharp. I'm missing the softness of the project as I've been viewing it in various other formats. Does Encore add some automatic sharpening I don't know about? H264 or MPEG2? Does that matter? Is there a bit of final gaussian blur I should be adding somewhere?

    Thank you kindly,
    aemilia
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    787
    Have you checked the TVs settings, if they have sharpening or other effects turned on?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Are you encoding a 1080p disc from a 1080p source? Whats bitrate are you using?
    Make sure the player/monitor is not up-converting and sharpening/aliasing.

    Encore's encoder is based on the Mainconcept engine, its fast, but not that good, and you dont' have much control over the output.

    Best to use x264 to encode and import the .264 file into encore. Use a -film or -grain profile and a 40mbs bitrate to keep more subtle texture.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Junior Member aemilia scott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    27
    My Source was a sequence made up of 1080P ProRes files, and some R3Ds as well.

    Okay, I'll check the player settings. You think it's best to give Encore an actual rendered out h264 to start with?

    By film or grain profile, do you mean I ought to apply a filter in AE or Premiere?

    Thanks very much for the suggestions.
    Last edited by aemilia scott; 06-18-2012 at 10:39 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Alexander Mejia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Champaign, IL
    Posts
    114
    If anything the image should be soft as Premiere will attempt a bilinear scale on the footage by default. Since this is a screener, chances are your audience won't have issues with the footage being a little sharp (as it will be blurred when it's played on a 80+ foot screen).

    It's possible that you exported the video into an interlaced format, it will make edges look ailased and sharp and all around ugly. Make sure you stay progressive scan as much as you can throughout the workflow chain.

    For the final delivery you will want to make sure you export it at the highest quality possible, meaning making sure all of your footage scales properly. Try contacting a processional finishing house, or a compression expert for final delivery if your publisher doesn't handle the QC on the export.
    Alexander Mejia, Video Editor, Colorist, and Compressionist Volition-Inc/THQ-Inc. @Alexander_Mejia
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    787
    Quote Originally Posted by Christopher*Seguine View Post
    Are you encoding a 1080p disc from a 1080p source? Whats bitrate are you using?
    Make sure the player/monitor is not up-converting and sharpening/aliasing.

    Encore's encoder is based on the Mainconcept engine, its fast, but not that good, and you dont' have much control over the output.

    Best to use x264 to encode and import the .264 file into encore. Use a -film or -grain profile and a 40mbs bitrate to keep more subtle texture.
    What alternative would you recommend for best quality?

    I presume outputting to an image sequence and then using which software?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Alexander Mejia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Champaign, IL
    Posts
    114
    x264 is (in my opinion) the most efficent software h.264 available today.

    X264 requires you to deliver your video in windows via an AVISynth script, or raw 4:2:0 YUV video. It's not the easiest thing in the world to set up, but it's worth it.

    Keep in mind that blu-ray has certain framerate and frame size limitations, so you won't be able to direct feed your 5K video into it. You will need to scale it down properly to 1920x1080 4:2:0. I personally prefer Spline36 resize method in AVISynth, but you may want to test a few resizing methods untill you find one that you like. If your footage doesn't have any kind of grain signature to it, you may find banding artifacts. You can either lay another grain pattern on top, or try to dither the signal to prevent it for your final export.
    Alexander Mejia, Video Editor, Colorist, and Compressionist Volition-Inc/THQ-Inc. @Alexander_Mejia
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Quote Originally Posted by aemilia scott View Post
    My Source was a sequence made up of 1080P ProRes files, and some R3Ds as well.

    Sounds like your using PR, render out to a single 1080p quicktime file, make sure max quality option is enabled - DNX, ProRes, or uncompressed YUV would be best.
    Check the quicktime to make sure the sharpness issue is not being caused by PR.




    Quote Originally Posted by aemilia scott View Post
    You think it's best to give Encore an actual rendered out h264 to start with?

    Always.




    Quote Originally Posted by aemilia scott View Post
    By film or grain profile, do you mean I ought to apply a filter in AE or Premiere?

    No, these are two presets for X264 encoder to simplify fine tuning the encode.


    More info for bluray encoding here:
    http://www.x264bluray.com/home/1080i-p


    Quote Originally Posted by Alexander Mejia View Post
    X264 requires you to deliver your video in windows via an AVISynth script, or raw 4:2:0 YUV video.

    Not for awhile, you can feed x264 with DNX, Uncompressed yuv quicktime, or Prores.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member Alexander Mejia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Champaign, IL
    Posts
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by Christopher*Seguine View Post
    Not for awhile, you can feed x264 with DNX, Uncompressed yuv quicktime, or Prores.
    You're correct, It looks like FFMPEG was updated to input and output Prores now. Thats awesome!
    Alexander Mejia, Video Editor, Colorist, and Compressionist Volition-Inc/THQ-Inc. @Alexander_Mejia
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    787
    Quote Originally Posted by Alexander Mejia View Post
    x264 is (in my opinion) the most efficent software h.264 available today.

    X264 requires you to deliver your video in windows via an AVISynth script, or raw 4:2:0 YUV video. It's not the easiest thing in the world to set up, but it's worth it.

    Keep in mind that blu-ray has certain framerate and frame size limitations, so you won't be able to direct feed your 5K video into it. You will need to scale it down properly to 1920x1080 4:2:0. I personally prefer Spline36 resize method in AVISynth, but you may want to test a few resizing methods untill you find one that you like. If your footage doesn't have any kind of grain signature to it, you may find banding artifacts. You can either lay another grain pattern on top, or try to dither the signal to prevent it for your final export.
    Alexander - do you think you could create a video tutorial showing your workflow? Thanks!

    Quote Originally Posted by Christopher*Seguine View Post
    you can feed x264 with DNX, Uncompressed yuv quicktime, or Prores.
    Christopher - I'd certainly like to see a video tutorial from you, how you pull it all together?
    Last edited by Les C.; 06-22-2012 at 07:27 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts