Thread: Subtlety

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26
  1. #11  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,914
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike 'Fireman' Ross View Post
    Errr perhaps because they know someone else is already working on it? Be interested to see what AJA come up with, for instance. I recently had a conversation at REDucation with Ted S. and an AJA guy... looking at a Ki Pro Mini... I remarked they should build basically the same thing but as a rear module, with various recording options... the response from the AJA guy was of the 'ummm watch this space...' variety ;-)

    Mike
    I think RED knows the deal, they ain't stupid.

    This "Alexa is better cuz it records to Apple Pro Res" crap needs to end.

    It's so misinformed it makes my ears bleed.
    ___________
    Nick Morrison
    Director, Producer, Writer (WGA-East)
    ASTRONAUT (Partner)
    www.astronautnyc.com
    www.nickmorrison.tv

    ASTRONAUT CAMERAS: Two Scarlets
    LENSES: Contax Multi-Cam Prime & Zoom Set (Leitaxed and RP Cine-Modded)
    POST: Avid Symphony Edit Suite, RRocket (x2)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member Robino_J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    254
    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Morrison View Post
    I think RED knows the deal, they ain't stupid.
    Can't say the same about producers, not all of them obviously but..
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member Brad Webb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    938
    There used to be an argument about Fuji film stocks having better skin tones thank Kodak. Now it's Alexa vs EPIC. Bottom line is both formats look amazing, and it simply comes down to personal preference.
    Scarlet X - 643 "Kong"
    DP Reel
    www.digitalladder.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member Curt Pair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by roryhinds View Post
    Red just need to ship a ProRes module and the Epic's out there will get more work.
    It's in the works Rory... trust me! It's awesome! I've heard about it from certain Red Engineers! It's going to record on two different types of media too!
    Epic M #565 "Opus"

    Adobe CS6 Production Premium, Matrox Axio/MXO2

    www.picturethisproductions.net
    - Info
    Demo material
    Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,914
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad Webb View Post
    There used to be an argument about Fuji film stocks having better skin tones thank Kodak. Now it's Alexa vs EPIC. Bottom line is both formats look amazing, and it simply comes down to personal preference.
    Until Dragon...which will burn Alexa to dust.
    ___________
    Nick Morrison
    Director, Producer, Writer (WGA-East)
    ASTRONAUT (Partner)
    www.astronautnyc.com
    www.nickmorrison.tv

    ASTRONAUT CAMERAS: Two Scarlets
    LENSES: Contax Multi-Cam Prime & Zoom Set (Leitaxed and RP Cine-Modded)
    POST: Avid Symphony Edit Suite, RRocket (x2)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Quote Originally Posted by Curt Pair View Post
    It's in the works Rory... trust me! It's awesome! I've heard about it from certain Red Engineers! It's going to record on two different types of media too!
    As long as it records at any frame rate that RAW can, this is the biggest news for RED since DSMC was announced.
    Mark Pugh LA,NYC, and AUS.

    www.markpughfilms.com
    Several EPICs...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Chatsworthless, CA
    Posts
    1,883
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Lyons Collister, ASC View Post
    It is an EPIC film yet the subtlety of the tonality and contrast and skin tones is filmic. We all know that the Epic can produce amazingly sharp colorful images than wow the eye. But now we have images that blow away the tonality of Alexa images.
    With all due respect, I honestly believe this was a combination of great lighting, great exposure, and great color correction -- not just the camera. I think talent at the level of Ridley Scott and Dariusz Wolski are going to get fantastic results with any camera they use. And I think CO3 colorist Stephen Nakamura had a lot to do with it as well.

    I've believed for a long time that we're getting to the point where the differences between camera choices is very much like the differences between film stocks. I would no more say, "wow, such-and-such a film looks so great because they shot with Vision 320" or "it looks great because of that Fuji 500." To me, that does a disservice to the work of the cinematographer, because they had the greatest effect on the image -- not the camera or the pickup. Strictly my opinion.
    www.cinesound.tv | location sound / post-production consultant
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Marc,

    I totally agree with you. I guess I am a little hyper sensitive to the tonality/skin tone discussion vis-a-vis Alexa versus Epic since I have been forced to use Alexa on numerous jobs because the director believes in the "Alexa" look. I agree that in the end it is the production design, the Dp's lighting and the colorist that have the most to do with how a film looks.

    In the past we as DPs were allowed to pick the camera, lenses and film stock UNLESS there was a financial reason for the studios. ( Often we would shoot Eastman as a camera stock and release prints would be Fuji. I would like to go back to being allowed to use the camera of my choice.

    Peter
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    now in Rome, Italy.
    Posts
    331
    Quote Originally Posted by Marc Wielage View Post
    I've believed for a long time that we're getting to the point where the differences between camera choices is very much like the differences between film stocks. I would no more say, "wow, such-and-such a film looks so great because they shot with Vision 320" or "it looks great because of that Fuji 500." To me, that does a disservice to the work of the cinematographer, because they had the greatest effect on the image -- not the camera or the pickup. Strictly my opinion.
    not strictly yours, Marc :-)
    Actually, I personally believe the differences between different high end camera systems today are even smaller than those between different camera stocks...but that's me.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    Didn't Red announce its in the works back in 2010?

    We need it now not in another 2 years.
    Rory Hinds
    Director / DoP / Colourist
    Mine Films & Mountain DI

    http://www.minefilms.com

    UK, USA, CANADA, EUROPE & SOUTH AFRICA

    IATSE 669 Director of Photography
    VFX, Grading & Finishing
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts