Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Epic at 320?

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 68
  1. #11  
    Many times I exposed what looked right at 800 ISO on location, then got in front of a monitor and found it looked more pleasing at 400 or 500. If needed, I lift the highlights with levels. The effect is much more pleasing than forcing 800 to work. Just my experience.

    Regardless, if I had shot at 320 there would be no where to go in post.

    Phil
    Artbeats: http://www.artbeats.com
    Phil's fine art site: http://www.prbates.com

    "Soli Deo Gloria"
    (if I say or do anything good, God gets all the credit)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member Gunleik Groven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    9,240
    Agreed. 800 gives you the safezone, especially for bad monitoring conditions and tungsten, both are situation where you may find that you need it...
    Life is good. So is RED...
    STUFF Now part II is out! Check it here:
    http://youtu.be/mhFB1CMzQBM
    http://igg.me/at/stuff/x/2338831
    http://bit.ly/mCwcoN
    Twitter: gunleik

    I am open for consulting, work and travel all over, really. Just PM me...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3.   Click here to go to the next RED TEAM post in this thread.
  #13  
    Yes, go above 800 and you are putting more of your code values above mid grey, hence more highlight protection. Don't over-do it though. You must balance the needs of the highlights with the needs of the shadows and that is the art of the cinematographer.

    Graeme
    www.red.com - 5k Digital Cinema Camera
    Science enables stories. Stories drive science
    FLUT™, Image Processing, Colour Science and Demosaic Algorithms, REDRAY 4K delivery
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member Gunleik Groven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    9,240
    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme Nattress View Post
    Yes, go above 800 and you are putting more of your code values above mid grey, hence more highlight protection. Don't over-do it though. You must balance the needs of the highlights with the needs of the shadows and that is the art of the cinematographer.

    Graeme
    A Graeme moment of Zen:
    Translation:
    Just do it "right", whatever is "right" for your exposure...
    Life is good. So is RED...
    STUFF Now part II is out! Check it here:
    http://youtu.be/mhFB1CMzQBM
    http://igg.me/at/stuff/x/2338831
    http://bit.ly/mCwcoN
    Twitter: gunleik

    I am open for consulting, work and travel all over, really. Just PM me...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5.   Click here to go to the next RED TEAM post in this thread.
  #15  
    "You must balance the needs of the highlights with the needs of the shadows and that is the art of the cinematographer" - I'll say it again then!

    Graeme
    www.red.com - 5k Digital Cinema Camera
    Science enables stories. Stories drive science
    FLUT™, Image Processing, Colour Science and Demosaic Algorithms, REDRAY 4K delivery
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Senior Member Shawn Nelson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    4,435
    800 is safer, but 320 is actually the native.

    I often do 320 if I need to.
    "Only those who attempt the absurd will achieve the impossible." -MC Escher
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member Mark Toia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brisbane... But could be anywhere in the world today
    Posts
    3,112
    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme Nattress View Post
    The main point to remember is lower the ISO, the more careful you need to be about protecting highlights in your exposure. So be careful, watch your meters, use the exposure overlay. And be careful.

    Graeme

    Dito.....
    Mark Toia
    Director / DP / Founder of Zoom Film & Television

    RED EPIC M #456, RED EPIC X #612, RED EPIC X #1137, RED EPIC DRAGON #(coming Soon)

    www.toia.com

    www.zoomfilmtv.com.au
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Senior Member Mark Toia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brisbane... But could be anywhere in the world today
    Posts
    3,112
    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme Nattress View Post
    "You must balance the needs of the highlights with the needs of the shadows and that is the art of the cinematographer" - I'll say it again then!

    Graeme
    Now your talking the talk... :)
    Mark Toia
    Director / DP / Founder of Zoom Film & Television

    RED EPIC M #456, RED EPIC X #612, RED EPIC X #1137, RED EPIC DRAGON #(coming Soon)

    www.toia.com

    www.zoomfilmtv.com.au
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9.   Click here to go to the next RED TEAM post in this thread.
  #19  
    Native? There is no native that has any real meaning I'm afraid. All there is is a point that balances the needs of the shadows and the needs of the highlights and that is scene dependent.

    Graeme
    www.red.com - 5k Digital Cinema Camera
    Science enables stories. Stories drive science
    FLUT™, Image Processing, Colour Science and Demosaic Algorithms, REDRAY 4K delivery
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    231
    what's this about lighting meter at 400 and setting camera at 800?
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts