Thread: RED MX QUALITY BETTER THAN SCARLET-X?

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1 RED MX QUALITY BETTER THAN SCARLET-X? 
    We've shot 3 projects using both the RED MX and the Scarlet-X, interchanging the same lenses between the cameras as required. I must say that to my eye the RED MX is producing consistently less noisy, 'smoother' looking images than the Scarlet-X when evaluated on a 2k monitor. The Scarlet-X is set up to match the settings on the RED MX, but the RED MX just seems to produce higher quality images.

    Has anyone else noticed this difference? I've read in earlier posts that the RED MX and EPICS have the 'A' grade sensors but I didn't expect the difference to be that noticeable when compared to the Scarlet-X (especially with respect to the noise level).
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Steve Yager's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    201
    Quote Originally Posted by Stelios Kokotos View Post
    We've shot 3 projects using both the RED MX and the Scarlet-X, interchanging the same lenses between the cameras as required. I must say that to my eye the RED MX is producing consistently less noisy, 'smoother' looking images than the Scarlet-X when evaluated on a 2k monitor. The Scarlet-X is set up to match the settings on the RED MX, but the RED MX just seems to produce higher quality images.

    Has anyone else noticed this difference? I've read in earlier posts that the RED MX and EPICS have the 'A' grade sensors but I didn't expect the difference to be that noticeable when compared to the Scarlet-X (especially with respect to the noise level).
    Can you post some full res comparisons?
    Scarlet-X #998
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Timur Civan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,224
    My DIT has said the same thing. Curious to get to the bottom of this.
    Director Of Photography
    RED Epic M - Fujinon Cabrio 19-90 T2.9 - Oconnor 2060 + accesories
    www.TstopCinema.com
    Timurcivan@gmail.com
    9175894424
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    203
    And I would ask how often in life the old saying "you get what you pay for" turns out to be false. Maybe once in a rare while, but usually it is true. Maybe Red MX is better, doesn't mean Scarlet isn't a great camera, even if it were true.
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    150
    Well if it's true, and if we had known what exactly was the difference between the sensors or chips between these two, some of us would have gotten a used Red MX package at a bargain.
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Carey Lee Coffey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Florida/Los Angeles
    Posts
    625
    The good news is, Scarlet is still in its infancy... it will only get better through firmware and sensor upgrades.
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Timur Civan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,224
    http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthr...l=1#post979895

    read this post, sheds some light on the subject.
    Director Of Photography
    RED Epic M - Fujinon Cabrio 19-90 T2.9 - Oconnor 2060 + accesories
    www.TstopCinema.com
    Timurcivan@gmail.com
    9175894424
     

  8. #8  
    Moderator Martin Weiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    mostly Norway
    Posts
    5,767
    Please do not double post. The board has enough noise as is.

    http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showthread.php?t=243510
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts