Thread: The case for old Nikkors...

Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 66
  1. #31  
    Senior Member D Fuller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Gorham, Maine
    Posts
    1,384
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Strietmann View Post
    I'm a canon guy for the past 15 years or so but I'll take the 85 1.4 nikkor over the 85 1.2 canon any day.
    If there were a hall of fame for lenses, the Nikkor 85mm f1.4 AIS would be in it for sure.

    As spectacularly sharp as the new G version is, the AIS version is still the one that turns my head more often.
    David Fuller
    AirStream Pictures
    RED ONE #172MX
    EPIC-M #1053
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #32  
    Senior Member Stephen Mick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    495
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #33  
    Here's a pic taken with the 85mm 1.4 AIS (on film!) from back in my fashion days...
    "All art is deception."

    My DP reel...
    http://www.evingrantdp.com
    http://www.YouTube.com/evingrant
    360º Cinematography and camera rigs...
    http://www.360dop.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #34  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    301
    Yes, there is something quite magical about the 85mm 1.4 AI-s. Many agree.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #35  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    1,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Evin Grant View Post
    When available I highly recccomend trying to get a really good condition AI lens over an AIS despite the newer vintage because the AI series has a longer focus rotation (180+) and more marks.
    Not trying to bust your chops, just for people's information:

    There are exceptions.

    The AI-s 180 2.8 has different optics, adding an ED element. I haven't used the AI but lack of ED likely means it flares a little worse and has a little less contrast. Also the AI-s version actually has a slightly longer focus throw.

    The AI-s 28 2.8 has different optics. I haven't used the AI but supposedly it's "just" very good whereas the AI-s is excellent. Also the loss of focus throw is slight.

    I suspect the AI-s 28 2 has different optics because while it has the same number of elements the minimum focus distance differs. I haven't used either version, by the way.

    Also, some may care that the AI-s 180 2.8 & 50 1.2 have 9-blade apertures whereas the AI versions have 7. Awesome stars are the best thing about the 50 1.2 (http://leesaxon.com/stars.jpg), and I can't say whether the AI version gives them to you.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #36  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    928
    For reasons that are just too painful to explain, I saw my beloved Nikon 85mm 1.4 bouncing across a concrete floor last night on a shoot ... I am getting another one.
    Robert Castiglione
    www.neweditionsfilm.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #37  
    Senior Member Keith_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, New York
    Posts
    176
    I love old Nikkor glass! We are testing a set of Non-AI Nikkor primes right now.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #38  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    301
    Oh Bob, sorry to hear you lost a such a beloved family member. Our Nikon family sends condolences to yours.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #39  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    150
    Just bought a BRAND NEW 28mm F2 Zeiss ZE last week for $1283. This weekend I ran some tests with it up against my $400 Nikkon 28mm F2 AIS with adapter on my Canon 60D.

    I thought I made a mistake with the marker cards. I couldn't figure out where the Zeiss shots ended and where the Nikons began. I thought the ID cards had been mixed up. I redid the test.

    I was SHOCKED. SHOCKED I tell you. Twenty+ year old Nikon was as sharp and as contrasty as the Zeiss ZE at both 2 and 2.8. The 28MM is a real winner!

    The 105mm's will kick ass forever.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #40  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    928
    Thanks Vance. There was total silence and kind of wrapped attention as we all just watched it ...
    Robert Castiglione
    www.neweditionsfilm.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts