But by the looks of things now that mount is A ok since I can't find a 19mm...
Given what Jarred says their lead engineer says about the 90...I really can't wait to get hold of an M mount and stick it on the Scarlet when it arrives...then the EPIC later happy days!
The Summicron-R 90mm f/2 performs pretty damn well too. Extremely natural "feeling" color.
I feel weird posting images in this thread, but I don't see harm in a link. Here are some "straight" Summicron-R shots with subtle hues.
Was very tempted though to get the F2, but having all 1.4 would be very nice
Is there a new version of the Leica 21mm that doesn't have the protruding element going past the mount? Would that be useable?
Because I see -> http://www.photocrati.com/wp-content...es-428x500.jpg
and I see .> http://en.leica-camera.com/assets/gallery/4464.jpg
The first is obvious it wouldn't work
the second looks like it would
I know the 21mm elmar won't work for sure but the 24 and 21 Lux both look like they could mount...
Imran, to me, the lens without the protrusion looks like a 3D rendering, whereas the other looks like a photo. It's possible that all of them do have the bit sticking out.
SpaceCam mount + 21mm, 24mm Summilux, 35mm 1.2 Voigtlander Nokton and so on...would need to re-do the focus tabs to allow for focus gears etc. but it'd be second best thing to Leica PL lenses
But there is something worth noting: the little illuminated sign with the St. George cross is rendered too harshly. Nothing to do with the lens, but this seems to be a problem with digital sensors. I assume you used a digital camera for these shots?
EDIT: I suppose that highlight recovery in editing software could solve that little problem.
really sad , that RED epic can't use the full range. I could only wished that they would offer a special sensor gate for us lecia M users.
I would surely pay good money for this option.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|