Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: red zoom 17-50 on alexa?

Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 47
  1. #21  
    Senior Member Timur Civan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,224
    So now that we are completely off topic, lets try to figure out the lens situation. Regardless of politics right now, Utku has a problem. lets help him.

    I unfortuantly have no experience with the RPZ 17-50. Anyone with experience have any insight?
    Director Of Photography
    RED Epic M - Fujinon Cabrio 19-90 T2.9 - Oconnor 2060 + accesories
    www.TstopCinema.com
    Timurcivan@gmail.com
    9175894424
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Washington DC Metro Area
    Posts
    2,015
    Quote Originally Posted by David Battistella View Post
    Overtime is cheaper than shoot days. it's as simple as that.
    Not if you are paying union wages, with overtime. You get into golden time and I take $180 per hour for "small" shoots. On a feature scale shoot that's up to $360 per hour.

    So, yeah ... if they want a 40 hour day, that will cost them a lot. $5700 by my calculation, just for me to DP for that time.

    My point is not to collect that rate ... Oh I wouldn't mind a couple hours now and again. My point is to cause producers to resist keeping me, and my crew (for whom I insist on overtime and turnaround requirements!) from working until we drop or get hurt. (Which is what happens when an electric is trying to hang a 2K up a 25' ladder after 18 hours on set.) I once was on a show when I had my BBE twist an ankle. That was hour 18. So I got together with the gaffer and key and refused to work until a turnaround. Producer wrapped, angrily. We nearly lost the head of wardrobe as she drove home that morning ... because she drove off a little twisty mountain road asleep at the wheel.

    So, fuck any producer that wants those sorts of stupid hours. Fuck em straight to the bank, which is the only thing they understand.
    Alexander Ibrahim
    Director & DP
    editing/color correction/compositing/effects
    http://www.alexanderibrahim.net
    http://www.zenera.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23  
    Senior Member Harry Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,625
    Alexander,
    You are spot on. It's amazing how (greedy, dumb, desperate, insert your own adjective here) producers will risk the lives of fellow humans for a DUMB FILM PROJECT. And by that I mean anything from the stupidest used car lot commercial all the way right up to a work of art by one of the greats. Human life and health ≠ completion of a project.
    There is no excuse for it. The bank is, indeed, the only thing some of them understand.
    Sorry to further hijack.
    I have no specific knowledge of the 17-50, and less so how it does or does not fit on an Alexa, but I know that the PL mount is a pretty precise fit that unfortunately has changed a bit over the years. I had an older, third party Arri bayo-to-PL adapter that worked fine on BL-series cameras but not Moviecams. When the Arricams came out, this adapter would not work on them either. Turns out there is a slight chamfer to the inner edge of the mount in the camera. Some legacy adapters and lenses had a slightly shallower chamfer and would not allow the mating surfaces to actually meet each other, and as a result, the ring could not be rotated to lock (even if it could have, the focus markings would have been off and you couldn't focus to infinity) It's possible this design change came as a result of Arri purchasing Moviecam (or a controlling interest in Moviecam) and adopting some design elements into the Arricam- and later- cameras. Obviously, it's a minor change, if in fact it's a change at all, and more likely than not it was my third-party adapter. But it worked on one series of cameras and not another. Could be there is a small difference in spec between Alexa and Red in this one particular dimension.
    Not saying that's what is going on here, but I do remember getting boned by this obscure difference in the distant past.
    Cheers,
    Harry
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24  
    I hear ya.

    But One if the discussions after a screening was the very fact that adding a day to a schedule was always WAY more cost prohibitive than even days of overtime. Typically a shoot day is about 80k which is hard to hit even with all the penalties.

    I wish it was jot this way but it is.

    Why are none of the French crew guys kicking in here. Nobody would work like that I'm Europe.
    "A revolution is not a bed of roses.
    A revolution is a struggle between the future and the past." – Fidel Castro
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25  
    Guess the Red Pro Prime/ARRI BL35 question isn't gonna be answered ... good luck Utku
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26  
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    istanbul turkey
    Posts
    36
    i guess next time a dp asks for red zoom and alexa i will just explain him my experiences
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,150
    Uh guys - the work hours discussion, it sucks, we've all been there....Lack of a prep day biting you too. Lets keep this a lens forum.

    What parts of the 17-50 were not fitting with the Alexa ? I understand it was the camera side PL mount ears hitting the iris ring area of the lens ?
    and that some people were able to modify the Alexa to remedy this ??

    Matt Uhry
    www.mattuhry.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8.   This is the last RED TEAM post in this thread.   #28  
    THere is an optional upgrade modification coming for the 17-50mm but on the front side and not the backside.. not sure it will help whatever problem it is here ( still don't understand the issue here? )
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #29  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    3,592
    Utku, could you be more specific as to what the problem was that you suffered and what was done to make it work for the shoot?

    From what you wrote, it sounds like the finger tabs on the ALEXA's mount that one uses to rotate the retaining ring protrude far enough forward to interfere with the lens in some way. By removing these you were able to seat the lens properly in the mount and then rotated the retaining ring without the tabs. Is this correct?
    Mitch Gross
    Applications Specialist
    AbelCine

    mitch@abelcine.com
    212-462-0100
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #30  
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    istanbul turkey
    Posts
    36
    Mitch you are correct
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts