Other great review of Red EPIC M by Vicent Laforet

[Luis Melgar]

This is the review, and the most interesting is that he is a STILL photographer, and a Canon DSLR boy...

http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2011/...still-picture/

[Erwin Vanderhoydonks]

He has seen the light and the difference between DSLR and RED... Good for him.

[TonySegreto]

Great post. Vince is a great guy, and knows his stuff. As if the Epic needed more positive feedback :)

[Graham_C]

Yup,this is a fab review.Well review doesn`t seem to do it justice really,it`s Vincent describing a game changer .Fantastic stuff.Epic.

[Justin R Goff]

Agreed, this is a cool little review, and it's been getting passed around on Twitter a lot. I think the the still photography world is really taking notice of this.

[A_Love]

Great test reel! Loved it Truely Epic!

[Scott Crawley]

That is significant.

[Brad Webb]

Even if you never use a Red camera, you will benefit from Red's existence. No doubt that Vincent Laforet's post is on the desk of every CEO of every camera company right now. The impact of EPIC is huge. I had no idea it was going to effect stills cameras like this, but you better believe that Nikon and Canon's next round of cameras will shoot live HDR.

[R. Gonzales]

It's an informative review for sure. I must admit when I watched the video prior to reading the post I starred to drool. I thought the time-lapse footage was from the EPIC, but then I read the review... One can only wait and hope the stills and time-lapse functions of the EPIC will rival the DSLR ability for time-lapse.

I'm looking forward to the behind the scenes footage and the workflow used.

[Keegan Flynn]

I love Epic to death, but honestly I'd rather shoot photos with a full-frame (36x24mm) DSLR sensor. Of course, there are obvious benefits to being able to pull exactly the moment you want out of thousands of stills while retaining that high standard of image quality.