Thread: Nikon "G" 1.4 primes, a mini review...

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 99
  1. #1 Nikon "G" 1.4 primes, a mini review... 
    I just purchased the new Nikon "G" series F1.4 lesnes and although in the past I've done very extensive reviews, since I do not currently have my Red One or a new Epic in my possession I'm just going to post a little mini review based on my impressions using a humble Nikon D3 and D7000.

    At one point or another I've owned pretty much every fast Nikon prime made from the 58mm f1.2 NOCT to the 28mm f1.4 Aspheric and every version of the 50mm 1.4 in both AF and MF. I've also shot with the Canon 24mm f1.4, 50mm and 85mm f1.2, Zeiss 85mm 1.4 ZF, Superspeed and Master Prime lenses so I'm pretty familiar with the strengths and tradeoffs of highspeed designs. In general it's been folly to expect stellar performance from any F/T1.4 of faster lens wide open, the Master Primes were some of the first lenses to really seem to accomplish this, on the still side Nikon's 28mm 1.4 Aspheric did acceptably well at 1.4 but improved dramatically by F2. The only still lenses that seemed truly comfortable wide open were the very expensive Leica M Aspherical 35mm and 50mm 1.4, followed recently by the 21 and 24mm 1.4s and the Ultra Prime priced 50mm .95 Noctilux.

    All this leads me to the new "G" series Nikon 1.4 primes, they have been announced for a while and tricking out of Japan so I decided to pick them up before the shortages from the earthquake caught up with the limited supply here in the US. I had sold all my previous generation f1.4 Nikkors last year so this was a planned purchase and was mostly motivated by the faster AF-S motors that will also facilitate there use on Epic. What I had not anticipated was the improvements that Nikon had made in redesigning the 35, 50 & 85mm and the brand new 24mm.



    There is minimal edge enhancement sharpening added in Adobe camera RAW, this is just to negate the effects of the in camera low pass filter. The files do show a smidge of Jpeg compression artifacts so be gentle.

    I'll start wide with the 24mm...


    Resolution is great, especially for f1.4 but the really impressive aspect is the complete lack of veiling flare. Look at the blown out window in the upper right corner of the frame and then check out how crisp and contrasty the left side is and 100% grab.



    The 35mm is a dead on match for the 24mm in terms of resolution and contrast, all of the new 1.4s have a 9 blade rounded iris for pleasing Bokeh, they also focus considerably closer than previous versions with the two wides focusing under 1 foot!



    The 50mm is the sole lens without the new Nano crystal coat, it's also the only one that's under $1000, however it still performs admirably and appreciably better than it's predecessor wide open. Although it's the least whizbang of the bunch it should have no problem intercutting.



    The 85mm is the biggest surprise though, the last generation of 85mm 1.4 Nikkor was a real favorite of mine and I had expected great things of it's successor but I had not imagined that in addition to improving the performance wide open they would be able to make the king of smooth even butterier. The Bokeh of this lens is just mouth watering, backgrounds just dissolve into a puddle of color and tone leaving just a fine razor thin line of impeccable sharpness.

    Ok, enough gushing, I can't wait to get my Epic and a Nikon G mount to try these out.
    "All art is deception."

    My DP reel...
    http://www.evingrantdp.com
    http://www.YouTube.com/evingrant
    360º Cinematography and camera rigs...
    http://www.360dop.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member michael zaletel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,303
    Quote Originally Posted by Evin Grant View Post
    The Bokeh of this lens is just mouth watering, backgrounds just dissolve into a puddle of color and tone leaving just a fine razor thin line of impeccable sharpness.
    Sentence of the week. Love it!

    -Michael Zaletel
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Julio Quintana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,468
    Thanks for the review Evin. I guess there are two pieces that would make these an obvious choice over their Canon counterparts:

    1. Estimated availability of the Nikon mount for Epic
    2. Availability of the Redmote Pro and its viability as a decent wireless follow focus (to negate the reverse focus gear issue)

    Jarred?
    Julio Quintana
    www.juliomquintana.com

    EPIC-X #560
    Canon Lens Package-
    -11-16mm f2.8
    -16-35mm f2.8
    -24mm f1.4
    -35mm f1.4
    -50mm f1.2
    -85mm f1.2
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Larry McKee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    755
    Thanks for the review, Evin. This is the set I have been seriously considering for the Epic. Sounds like it will work as well as I had hoped.
    Epic-X 1136
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    1,314
    I haven't used the 35 but your comments on the other 3 match my experience spot-on.

    The minute I can afford these guys...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Jacek Zakowicz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,752
    Couple of years ago I ran across a 14-24 and put it on my test projector. And that's exactly why I made my Prolock. Nikon is the King of Glass. The colors look alive. Sharpness and contrast are outstanding. These four lenses plus the three zooms 14-24, 24-70 and the 70-200 make the dream set. I should stop now before I get in trouble...
    Jacek Zakowicz, Optitek-dot-org, jacek2@optitek.org
    Professional Broadcast and Digital Cinema Equipment
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Larry McKee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    755
    Quote Originally Posted by OptiTek View Post
    Couple of years ago I ran across a 14-24 and put it on my test projector. And that's exactly why I made my Prolock. Nikon is the King of Glass. The colors look alive. Sharpness and contrast are outstanding. These four lenses plus the three zooms 14-24, 24-70 and the 70-200 make the dream set. I should stop now before I get in trouble...
    Preach it, Brother! Been a Nikon user for decades. Love that glass.
    Epic-X 1136
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    110
    Since these lenses don't have manual irises, how would you control that on a Red One?
    Clint Childers

    Red#846
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member Larry McKee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    755
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint Childers View Post
    Since these lenses don't have manual irises, how would you control that on a Red One?
    Use the ProLock Nikon mount from Optitek.
    Epic-X 1136
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    110
    Good to know! Thanks
    Clint Childers

    Red#846
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts