Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Dino EPIC #00087 & CAMTEC 5K FF LENS CHART

Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456789 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 81
  1. #51  
    Senior Member Jens Jakob Thorsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    483
    Great with all that info! What about ARRI Zeiss LWZ-1 and 2 (if there is a difference in optics)?
    Jens Jakob Thorsen D.F.F.
    DOP
    Denmark
    www.jensjakob.com
    mail@jensjakob.com
    Epic #479
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #52  
    Senior Member Andrew clemson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Dubai, U.A.E
    Posts
    1,137
    Would also be keen to know about the RPZ 18-85.......?
    RED Tech and D.I.T,
    EPIC M, EPIC-X and Scarlet Pusher,
    Dubai, United Arab Emirates
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #53  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    707
    And has anyone tried MKIII superspeeds? I love these lenses and I don't really want to get rid of them. Hopefully they are ok. But has anyone tried the new Zeiss LWZ2? I just bought one of these and its my favourite lens at the moment. Especially at 4.5K 2:1.
    Adam Eden
    __________________________________________
    Epic M 8xx, Epic X 25xx
    Steadicam and heaps of cool sh*t
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #54  
    I put up a set of MKIII Superspeeds on a pair of Epic-M cameras we used for some visual effects work for Transformers 3 through Kerner Optical. The shoot ended up using matched 16-42 Optimos on the Kernercam 3D rig... but I couldn't help myself, being a curious AC. I put up the beautiful set of MKIII's that Kerner has and took a look in the prep bay. All looked great, but the 18mm had me wondering a bit - Looking at 5K Full Frame - I thought I saw the slightest bit of vignetting/shading in the corners of the image. It was subtle - perhaps you can see it in the photo. The ultimate test would be a green screen or a neutral gray or something, but there wasn't any of that to be had. I know Dino's chart said the 18mm Superspeed was perfect, but I did see some slight shading, that couldn't be attributed to light falloff on the chart. Might be perfectly acceptable for meat & potatoes work at healthy stops, but wide open on VFX work I dunno.

    Anybody have similar experiences? I hope its an isolated case as I absolutely love those lenses.
    Attached Images
    Michael Hardwick
    Cinematographer
    1st Assistant Camera
    IATSE Local 600
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #55  
    Senior Member Andrew clemson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Dubai, U.A.E
    Posts
    1,137
    Sounds like the angle rouge is a good investment these days. How much does the v2 upgrade cost and is it available on lenses bought new? Or do you have to buy and send off?
    RED Tech and D.I.T,
    EPIC M, EPIC-X and Scarlet Pusher,
    Dubai, United Arab Emirates
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #56  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Hardwick View Post
    I put up a set of MKIII Superspeeds on a pair of Epic-M cameras we used for some visual effects work for Transformers 3 through Kerner Optical. The shoot ended up using matched 16-42 Optimos on the Kernercam 3D rig... but I couldn't help myself, being a curious AC. I put up the beautiful set of MKIII's that Kerner has and took a look in the prep bay. All looked great, but the 18mm had me wondering a bit - Looking at 5K Full Frame - I thought I saw the slightest bit of vignetting/shading in the corners of the image. It was subtle - perhaps you can see it in the photo. The ultimate test would be a green screen or a neutral gray or something, but there wasn't any of that to be had. I know Dino's chart said the 18mm Superspeed was perfect, but I did see some slight shading, that couldn't be attributed to light falloff on the chart. Might be perfectly acceptable for meat & potatoes work at healthy stops, but wide open on VFX work I dunno.

    Anybody have similar experiences? I hope its an isolated case as I absolutely love those lenses.

    GREAT NEWS!!!! YOU HAVE MADE MY DAY THAT I DON'T NEED NEW LENSES!!!
    Adam Eden
    __________________________________________
    Epic M 8xx, Epic X 25xx
    Steadicam and heaps of cool sh*t
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #57  
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Eden View Post
    GREAT NEWS!!!! YOU HAVE MADE MY DAY THAT I DON'T NEED NEW LENSES!!!
    Not sure I said that... I do have concerns about the 18mm - the 25, 35, 50 and 85 were super clean. Maybe somebody out there with an Epic-M and a 18mm Superspeed MKIII can double check me on this.

    Vignetting and slight shading in the corners - (?)

    Maybe shoot a gray card and double check on a waveform monitor to be certain.
    Michael Hardwick
    Cinematographer
    1st Assistant Camera
    IATSE Local 600
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #58  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Richmond, VA, USA
    Posts
    109
    Looks like this has been asked a couple of times but don't think I saw a response: Does anyone know the coverages on the Red Pro Zoom 18-85mm? Also, I am very curious about the Red 17-50mm zoom.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #59  
    Moderator Tom Lowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    somewhere worshiping Terrence Malick
    Posts
    8,211
    I feel like I am seeing a slight vignette on the Ultra Prime 16mm. Is it just my imagination?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #60  
    Tom, I just did a quick test for you with my Ultra Prime 16mm. It's not your imagination.

    EPIC-M 5K FF
    Zeiss Ultra Prime 16mm @ T1.9

    Reply With Quote  
     

Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts