I tried to summarize my impressions on their thread: http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthr...t=55359&page=3
|
|
I tried to summarize my impressions on their thread: http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthr...t=55359&page=3
Epic S35's 5K FF is 5120x2700 and is a 1.896:1 aspect ratio.
1.896: is also the ratio for the 4k/2k DCI formats:
4096x2160 = 1.896:1
2048x1080 = 1.896:1
posted it here also: http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthr...791#post727791
Its full sensor not full frame?
please correct me if I'm wrong
Thanks Deanan. Are you guys considering changing the name to FS for full sensor, or 1.896? Or do you plan on keeping the FF?
The Optimo Rouge 16-42 2nd generation does cover 100% of the zoom range, i will change the chart shortly.
dino
p.s. thanks Jean-Marc From Angenieux for clarification!
here is a picture Jean-Marc sent me from NYC with the lens on 007.
![]()
Does the Arri Master Zoom cover on the wide end?
Any thoughts on the long zooms being able to be tweaked to work with Epic?
I hope lens manufacturers will respond quickly, adaptors are problematic for the long zooms so an updated lens is preferable :)
I understand that Arri and Sony (f65 8k camera) are steering clear of sensors that are of a size that won't work with existing 35mm lenses. I wonder if RED had a choice? Larger pixels help with reducing S/N but I wonder if DPs would trade more noise for greater lens choice?
Not a deal breaker but for aerials 24-290 is a key lens.
Mike Brennan
Thanks for all the information Dino. Has anyone checked the Zeiss Compact Prime mark 2 range on the EPIC in 5K FF?
Cheers,
Robert
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Tags for this Thread |