Peter already said that 48fps is not for all movies, 3D in the other end IMO is, even so I am not signing in to make all my movies in 3D, as at times depending on what my story calls for, I would want to use specific lenses and effects redundant in 3D.
Yes, this is what I mean. If they could shoot 3D in 24fps without having any problems they would. All the "looks better because it looks more realistic" is BS.
Originally Posted by Rudi Herbert
Why not chill a little and not use terms like BS when referring to the efforts of Peter Jackson and other people that are genuinely trying to produce as good as possible, from their enormously educated perspective, a better cinematic experience?
I love PJ too but it's the truth. They have to try to "sell" the 48fps "videolike" look because they have to use it.
Last edited by Josh Snyder; 04-29-2012 at 10:19 AM.
RED is the PC of cinema world. Most powerful, most customizable and most freedom.