Scarlet S35 is now...

[Sanjin Jukic]

Spill the beans Sanjin.....What did you know and when did you know it! :D

G Lap,

nothing special except that is based on my pretty good analysis and that's what predictions are all about...

[Tom Lowe]

Great job, SJ!!

I never understood the Scarlet naming regime anyway. It seemed too confusing. And I agree that 48 - 60fps should be included on Epic Light, of course.

[Joseph Hutson]

called EPIC Light. The features have changed as has the price. I'll update in the next two weeks.

Jim

Smart move as to not confuse the general public on 4 different kinds of Scarlets...

[Joe D'Arcy]

G Lap,

nothing special except that is based on my pretty good analysis and that's what predictions are all about...

Now...about those Leicas

[Richard_JP]

Same camera, different name, just to justify a price increase. Hmm...

[Steven-Marc C.]

Same camera, different name, just to justify a price increase. Hmm...

"The features have changed"

[Felix K.]

The names are now based on the size of the sensor. Everything that is S35 or more is called Epic. Epic light means, that it has a little bit less horsepower and thus costs less.

Scarlet is the 2/3 sensor.

[Henry Olonga]

Keep it coming RED - played with some RAW files a while back and never want to go back.........

[John Burnley]

I don't want to get overly hung up on names or nomenclature but as others have commented, I'd suggest re-thinking the name, "light" as it could be construed by some as being Epic "inferior" or some such. I think what you are meaning to impart is that it's light on features/performance when compared ONLY to the traditional (and more expensive) Epic brain. The LT designation, as suggested by one poster, is going in a better direction, in my opinion.

[John Burnley]

But - designating the S35 part of the Epic family (rather than Scarlet) makes perfect sense to me.