I'm sure I'm alone on this, but I had always thought of the CF recording option as a temporary fix until the SSD's dropped in price. Limited frame rates, limited bit rates, etc? Pardon my french, but fuck the CF's. Let's get the SSD's rolling out!
|
|
I'm sure I'm alone on this, but I had always thought of the CF recording option as a temporary fix until the SSD's dropped in price. Limited frame rates, limited bit rates, etc? Pardon my french, but fuck the CF's. Let's get the SSD's rolling out!
What does the base station do, other than power the other modules?
Can we have a 3.5" module as well please?
My experience is similar, and even with all that, the best solutions I have are not what I'd call reliable. A DIT puts major demands on a reader, and most of us end up swapping out readers to keep them from getting hot.
To put things in perspective, the Sonnet Qio which is the only other e-sata multiformat reader is $1000.00 and the people I've talked to who bought one say they are unreliable.
RED will test that REDStation will work with RED media specifically, we don't have that now.
This just plain rocks.
What I want to know is it port multiplier aware or does each module require a discrete e-sata connection?
I'm hopeful that it will work with the Sonnet Sata Pro Express card reader and still allows me to use an e-sata drive when I get stuck working on a MacBook Pro.
There's money in my account at RED...
Just need an add to cart button to push :-)
BTW my 18mm showed up today, so I'm having a Redtacular day!
Steve
Last edited by Stephen Lovett; 04-07-2010 at 01:45 AM. Reason: typo
A cable-less solution would be far more elegant and way more cool. Perhaps in the future...
Great idea, though.
It's great to get a reliable data reader (can it be used as a writer too - ie it mounts media as standard drives)
I think you're right Brook - that worries me a bit because those connectors aren't the most physically robust (although neither are firewire, esata and usb!) and probably aren't designed for that many mating cycles considering they're meant for internal hard discs! Hmmm.
At least there is an alternative power input supplied!
Actually, are those SATA power connectors in parallel with the round 2.1mm DC input jacks on ALL the modules, not just the base station? That would be the best redundancy if the base station developed a fault - but then ... why do we need the base station again? And if not, then if the base station goes faulty, you can't continue to daisy chain modules via SATA power and might have to find 3 wall warts at short notice!
So, using SATA, how long would it take to offload a full 64 gig cf card to a MBP with a SATA drive attached?
Is the computer going to be the bottleneck?
Jochen
For backing up on set? I never use 2.5" drives, always use 3.5". Bigger, Cheaper, Faster, Better.
So you have to have the base station to power more than one module with a single cable? You couldn't power one module off the mains and the other module via the eSata power connector?
I kinda always assumed the Red Station would be a stand-alone system, so you plug your CF card in one module, your archive drive in another and hit "backup" on the base. But it seems you still need a laptop to use this configuration.
Even so, it's definitely more elegant than other solutions at present. And as others have said, hopefully faster & more reliable CF reader.
How much power does each module and the base station consume?
Can't see a fan vent - so presumeably they run very cool or have massive heatsinks!
From my understanding of Jarred's first couple of posts it seems that, yes, if you do not use the base station to distribute power, each individual module will need it's own power supply. This seems to be supported by the rear shot HERE where the DC IN port on the base is of larger diameter than the ports on the modules (presumably for higher wattage intake to distribute to multiple devices).
I think these modules are solely (at this point at least) intended to dump footage off to a computer with eSata, Firewire or USB interface. So no 3.5" module because the new camera system will not have a 3.5" recording option (unless you are using legacy RED Drives.) The 2.5" are mainly intended, I think, for SSD's which I'm sure RED is ensuring are going to much faster and better than any 3.5" platter; though not cheaper or bigger :)
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |