Great News Jim.
Can someone please demystify ONBOARD SSD!!!
|
|
Great News Jim.
Can someone please demystify ONBOARD SSD!!!
Last edited by Tim Whitcomb; 03-31-2010 at 10:15 PM. Reason: punc
Wait, so it is 2.5:1 compression that is mathematically lossless?!?!
I inmediatelly assumed that this could not be the rate of compression and remain mathematically lossless, so I assumed that he was refering to an aspect ratio...
2.5:1?!?! Are you serious Jim? Really? Please clarify cause that sounds too good to be true! When is RED going to get their first technical Oscar? :)
How heavy is the uncompressed stream at 24fps? Can the brain keep up at 100 fps? Will all of this, or most of it, be revealed at NAB? Is there anything you can tell us now?
I am no DP, but I would agree with Larry! Somewhere around there should be plenty for serious 5k productions. Now if you have oodles of budget, sure, shoot the whole darn thing in lossless, but there will be no point in doing so other than perhaps for chroma, DFN, etc... correct?
Lagarith Lossless codec offers roughly 4:1 on average for demanding video. In fact, for black/white sequences, I have noticed 10:1 or greater, with credits being more like 100:1. Overall, 5:1 sounds about right. And it is 100% lossless, free, and available online. Of course, it isn't really a capture format! 13.5 stops at the price level, however, is damn near worthy of a technical Oscar.
Thank you Sub. Yea, I wouldn't know what might take it but I figured it is just a matter of time for them to earn them one. Perhaps everything everyone ever wanted put together into one camera could do the trick?
So 2.5:1 is the compression ratio, perhaps not so aggressive because of storage being so big and so that cheaper gear can deconstruct it?
What is the size of 12-bit RAW at 5k? Please, someone, I just want to know how big the files will be. How does this go? 12 bytes x resolution? Can't be that simple...
OK... you guys can go ahead and discuss all of this compression math stuff, as soon as someone tells me the actual size of the file... please!!! xP
Just curiosity and to understand this precisely, should term "mathematically lossless" be understood literally implying the compression map is an identity? That is, when an image is compressed and decompressed the result is precisely the same image one started from at the first place.
The other possible interpretation is that the map is not an identity but the difference between the original and decompressed image is within some accuracy tolerance related to the hardware and consequently one may consider the difference is meaningless?
Whatever is the case all this is hairsplitting when it comes captured images. But, I love to understand what my (forthcoming) equipments really do.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |