Issues with images posted so far

[Brook Willard]

If memory serves, the only clipping that happened was in the straight, unprocessed screenshots. That means that they were overexposed by several stops in post... but the data is *actually* there. When we actually spent some time working with the pictures, all overexposure disappeared.

It's like the first time you put a negative in a film scanner. It'll look like absolute overexposed crap until the operator spins a few knobs. Those screenshots were before we spun *any* knobs.

[Roberto B]

You guys are all crazy. :)

which guys?.. ladies! gorgeous ones.. :love:

[Seung Han]

If memory serves, the only clipping that happened was in the straight, unprocessed screenshots. That means that they were overexposed by several stops in post... but the data is *actually* there. When we actually spent some time working with the pictures, all overexposure disappeared.

It's like the first time you put a negative in a film scanner. It'll look like absolute overexposed crap until the operator spins a few knobs. Those screenshots were before we spun *any* knobs.

Good to hear.

The two motion shots I've seen so far are amazing.

It'll be interesting to see some before and after shots of raw footage and then see what some talented people in post on these boards do to shape them up...

[Gavin Greenwalt]

The FrankenBrook grab had metal halide overhead, sodium vapor about 25 feet away and a light panel pointed in my general direction [I think]. It was also freakin' *dark* :)

Haha glad to hear. There were green, blue, cyan, yellow, orange and red hues which were devlish to seperate and seemed to be coming out of nowhere.

[James T Mather]

sure sure

all the other stuff I'm sure will be fine

I'm mostly concerned with clipping. Perpetually. It's a deal breaker for me.

Looks like you'll still need a Dp Ruairi.

[Nils Ruinet]

If memory serves, the only clipping that happened was in the straight, unprocessed screenshots. That means that they were overexposed by several stops in post... but the data is *actually* there. When we actually spent some time working with the pictures, all overexposure disappeared.

It's like the first time you put a negative in a film scanner. It'll look like absolute overexposed crap until the operator spins a few knobs. Those screenshots were before we spun *any* knobs.

Could you please post these, so we can see the difference ?

Thanks :)

[Ruairi Robinson]

Looks like you'll still need a Dp Ruairi.

Heh - definitely. That's not in question. I'm just trying to skip the stock cost and one-lights :)

[Brook Willard]

I'd post them, but I have a PPC Mac so I'm out of luck. Evin currently has the images and is having a blast with them.