Thread: DOF & beauty

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 123
  1. #11  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    494
    Just continuing on that point, the biggest issue with deep focus isn't inherent "beauty" so much as it is one's ability to parse a more complex frame. (It's also laziness: it's so much harder to light for deep focus as you need to be more precise on top of the far-increased light levels--not only is it like painting a faberge egg rather than finger painting, but you're also forced to use larger, inelegant brushes (fewer soft lights, bigger fixtures in general).)

    Most of the best B&W deep focus films are 4X3 and shot on sound stages (Citizen Kane, Magnificent Ambersons, Best Years of Our Lives) and the examples from Antonioni here rely heavily on leading lines and a a limited or B&W palette. In such cases we have decreased and more easily-controlled visual information. The Kurosawa shots are all telephoto and showcase borderline planometric staging. We may also note that minidv cinematography and deep focus photography in general is more conducive to telephoto work than traditional 35mm not just because zooming gives you a little bit of shallow focus, but also because you "select" what you show with more than just focal length; both focal length and depth of focus select a limited portion of the frame for the viewer and the absence of one cue often requires more of the other.

    That really great shot from Last Crusade uses high contrast, leading lines (there's a "V" or a "swoop" centering on the Joneses if you trace between the characters' eyes) and backlighting on a nearly colorless palette (excepting skintone, which should pop out) to be easily readable. The shot from New World likewise relies on a limited palette: brown and green, near complements, and a horizon line near eye level.

    I've been really fascinated by how summer blockbusters have recently adopted extremely limited palettes. The deep, saturated photography in the Transformers films and most of Michael Bay's most recent movies are basically just blue and orange (skin tone), with set design and lighting selected carefully to emphasize only those colors. "Grittier" movies (the overrated new Batman films, the Bourne films, Terminator 4) are simply becoming incredibly desaturated to support fast edits and shakicam camerawork. To some extent I prefer Bay's approach to Nolan's, heresy though that may be.
    Last edited by Matt W.; 11-17-2009 at 02:04 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Red Savant Steve Gibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Southern Utah and worldwide
    Posts
    3,603
    Some good examples there David...

    I recently watched the multiple Oscar-winning feature "The Sting" (1973, starring Newman and Redford) for the umpteenth time. There were very few examples of shallow DOF in the movie - it was almost all medium to deep focus. The director (George Roy Hill), and cinematographer (Robert Surtees) made the choice to use what they felt was best DOF to tell the story - and the Academy voters seemed to like their choices - the movie won seven Oscars, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Cinematography. Significantly, the movie also won Oscars for Best Costume Design and Best Art Decoration - Set Direction, so I'm guessing the medium to deep DOF choice was an active choice by Hill and Surtees to immerse the viewer in the time period (1920's Chicago), the beautiful sets, and to weave parts of the story into the mid-ground and background.

    In that film there were so many interesting costumes, things going on, people doing things, cars, etc. in the framings in the mid-ground and background, that I think the medium to deep focus choices were spot on. I don't have any still frames from the movie to post...
    Golden Gate 3D
    Executive Producer, Director, DP, Cinematographer
    Epic-M 0008, Epic X (2), RED One 0008, Red One "London"
    http://www.gg3d.com/ (Golden Gate 3D web site)
    http://redconnector.com/user/gibby (Bio & Equipment)
    http://www.artbeats.com/footage/search?fh44=1 (Artbeats Gibby RED Collection)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Actually, though "The Sting" won a boatload of Oscars that year, the winner for Best Cinematography was "Cries and Whispers" (Sven Nykvist), the other nominees were:

    Jonathan Livingston Seagull (Jack Couffer)
    The Exorcist (Owen Roizman)
    The Sting (Robert Surtees)
    The Way We Were (Harry Stradling Jr.)

    http://www.imdb.com/Sections/Awards/...wards_USA/1974

    But "The Sting" is a great example of an earlier b&w aesthetic being applied -- deeper focus, medium shots, harder lighting -- which is appropriate since the movie is somewhat of a stylistic homage or throwback. I believe Surtees did a lot of the work with a bunch of small quartz movielamps, like 1K Baby Babies.

    Also, George Roy Hill was a master of staging in depth, and using foreground elements -- in fact, "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid" uses so many objects as foreground elements in artful compositions that the cast must have gotten a bit fed up with the time and care that Hill and Conrad Hall were taking to design these shots, leaving gaps in the frame for the actors to appear in... in some behind-the-scenes footage from the movie shoot, the cast showed up for work one day with tree branches stuck into their shirt collars, obscuring their faces.
    Last edited by David Mullen ASC; 11-17-2009 at 04:46 PM.
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Red Savant Steve Gibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Southern Utah and worldwide
    Posts
    3,603
    David,

    Good catch on Surtees Oscar nomination, rather than win. I glanced at the iMDB Oscar list for "The Sting" too quickly, and somehow I missed that he was nominated, but didn't win.

    I'm a big fan of George Roy Hill's work, including his use of the techniques (foreground elements, staging in depth, etc.) you mentioned for "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid". He was a master of directing the scenes he directed - and effectively telling the story at hand. I really enjoy watching his work...

    I definitely like it in any production when the selected focus depth is appropriate for most effectively telling the story of each scene, and the overall story. Focus depth is a tool to help viewers understand the story - but IMO that tool should be used judiciously.
    Golden Gate 3D
    Executive Producer, Director, DP, Cinematographer
    Epic-M 0008, Epic X (2), RED One 0008, Red One "London"
    http://www.gg3d.com/ (Golden Gate 3D web site)
    http://redconnector.com/user/gibby (Bio & Equipment)
    http://www.artbeats.com/footage/search?fh44=1 (Artbeats Gibby RED Collection)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    I think a true "deep focus" shot has to have objects in the near foreground that are just as sharp (or nearly) as the far background, that show how deep the focus is -- it gets a bit confusing when wide-angle shots simply look deep-focus because they are wide-angle. For example, is this a deep-focus shot or merely a wide-angle shot?:



    You can see in the tighter coverage that the f-stop was not particularly closed-down:
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    219
    I don't really have anything to add except... Wow, what an awesome thread. Thanks y'all.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Some more deep focus shots in my collection of frames:



    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    1,199
    Ahem, It's not Tarkovsky, but it's deep. Scroll down to # 26 ( :

    http://www.photography-now.net/listi...=29&Itemid=293
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    Tom, you started this thread... where are you?
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    Senior Member Gunleik Groven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    9,244
    I love these B&W deep focus compositions.
    Life is good. So is RED...
    STUFF Now part II is out! Check it here:
    http://youtu.be/mhFB1CMzQBM
    http://igg.me/at/stuff/x/2338831
    http://bit.ly/mCwcoN
    Twitter: gunleik

    I am open for consulting, work and travel all over, really. Just PM me...
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts