Thread: Red one and problems with wobble effect

Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Hybrid View

  1. #1 Red one and problems with wobble effect 
    Member Alberto Saiz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Spain/Kenya/Worldwide
    Posts
    32
    HI!

    I'm a wildlife cameraman and im currently working in two projects with RED One. we use Nikon lenses (80-200, 300 and 500mm) and shoot in 4K,3K and 2K when high speed is needed. When we`re working with long lenses were facing a problem of wooble effect in the image.it start to happens when the heat of the atmosphere goes up, but i think that 18ºC its not so hot!
    I know that some of you have worked with this camera in wild conditions in africa, alaska etc. Did you encounter this problem? any solutions?
    I think it has to be because the rolling shutter and the CMOS but its going to be a serious problem for us in a lot of shots.
    Thank you very much in advance!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest, GA
    Posts
    555
    It's not heat shimmer you're seeing?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Charles Angus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,055
    If the camera is motionless and the subject is motionless, I don't see how it could be CMOS wobble. Can you try that under the same cirumstances?
    Charles Angus Taylor
    www.charlesangustaylor.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    I've not experienced wobble on mine, unless you are talking about the normal wind or body vibration from shooting on a lens that long. The CMOS/ shutter should have no reason to be any different on a long tele than on a 'normal' shot.

    I'm guessing what you are actually seeing (especially with the 300 and 500mm) is heat shimmer, and the fact that the RED's monitor and sensor is sharp enough to resolve it clearly.

    Not only do long lenses have very shallow depths of field, but their biggest barrier to sharpness is the atmosphere. Even at reasonable distances, heat shimmer is highly magnified by long tele lenses. Long teles are subject to the same things that vex astronomers, which are called "seeing conditions."

    Heat shimmer is magnified when you shoot with lenses starting at around 200mm. The shimmer is emitted by obvious things like tarmac, rock, and cement, but also by not so obvious strata like grass, sage brush, and even snow. The temperature doesn't have to be that great for it to occur, as it is caused by the reflected heat from the surface heating up the cooler air above it, causing it to rise in waves. Because of this, heat shimmer can actually be just as noticeable on a cold clear day with no wind as a raging hot summers day.

    Nothing you can do to avoid it on long lenses, except for shooting earlier in the day, waiting for a cloudy day with less direct heat/sunlight, or hoping for a light breeze to disperse the effect.
    Hope that helps.
    #646 "Darwin"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Member Alberto Saiz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Spain/Kenya/Worldwide
    Posts
    32
    Thanks a lot for your quick answers. Yeah, I agree with you, its a heat issue, but we were surprised about the high sensitivity of the RED camera in these situations. Do you experienced this problem usually? How do you manage it, any solutions?
    Any suggestions are welcome!

    Thank you!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member James Brundige's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Snowmass, Colorado
    Posts
    816
    Shooting wildlife with a Canon 150-600, heat shimmer is the issue. Shoot early in the day, back off the zoom as things heat up. I can't see how the sensor type could have anything to do with this, unless you are getting some wind, which can vibrate a long lens. The rolling shutter will turn high frequency vibrations into wobble.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 photographer, or cinematographer ? 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    310
    Moving from one world to the other one might explain your surprise. I personally feel the effect of heat shimmer much more perceivable in the Red evf than in the optical viewfinder of my still camera. Anyway, I shot yesterday crystal clear images of an eagle feeding its chick, 250m away, 800 mm. The same image was horrendous a couple of hours before...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,318
    Quote Originally Posted by buhot View Post
    Moving from one world to the other one might explain your surprise. I personally feel the effect of heat shimmer much more perceivable in the Red evf than in the optical viewfinder of my still camera. Anyway, I shot yesterday crystal clear images of an eagle feeding its chick, 250m away, 800 mm. The same image was horrendous a couple of hours before...
    Probably just the bigger picture shows up the shimmer more noticeably.
    Director/Digital Camera Operator/2nd AC/DIT/Data Manager
    London, UK.

    Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts