Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Ask David Mullen ANYTHING

Reply to Thread
Page 453 of 480 FirstFirst ... 353403443449450451452453454455456457463 ... LastLast
Results 4,521 to 4,530 of 4792
  1. #4521  
    Auto anything doesn't negate the need to know how to do it manually.
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #4522  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    625
    Just wondering if you've had a chance to see the dark knight rises yet and if you enjoyed it?
    #6544
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #4523  
    Senior Member Kemalettin Sert's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Turkey
    Posts
    1,561




    what kind of filter you would use if you looking for this type of look.You prefer in camera effects or post for certain looks.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4524  
    I'd probably try an Antique Suede as a base filter and then augment further in post.
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4525  
    Quote Originally Posted by scott william View Post
    Just wondering if you've had a chance to see the dark knight rises yet and if you enjoyed it?

    Not yet, hopefully this weekend.
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #4526  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,493
    Quote Originally Posted by David Mullen ASC View Post
    I'd probably try an Antique Suede as a base filter and then augment further in post.
    I in no way wish to be annoying, (and apologize if I am doing so) but earlier you had mentioned that all color-based filter effects (not diffusion, not ND of course, but just color) could now be done just as well -no visible difference - 100% in post. Is there a caveat to that? Did I misunderstand your reply? Also, still would love to know the answer to my previous questions, which you perhaps forgot about in your very busy days (if you simply don't feel like answering it, then I apologize again if I am being annoying):

    "07-20-2012, 12:26 AM
    Hi David! I've now read this entire thread twice and have leaned so much! Thank you again on behalf of all of us!

    I have today a boring question, and perhaps a more interesting one.

    Boring: What do you use to help with IR contamination on Epic? How hot does it have to be on set before that IR filter fails?

    More interesting: Today I was having coffee with a fellow D.P., and his opinion was that more experienced you get, the fewer light sources you tend to use "It's the new DPs who feel they need twenty lights for a close-up". Would you agree with this? Do you use fewer sources now than when you started?"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #4527  
    Senior Member Stephen Williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    3,879
    20 lights for a CU, Oh dear, not good news me thinks!
    Epic M owner
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #4528  
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Ruffo View Post
    I in no way wish to be annoying, (and apologize if I am doing so) but earlier you had mentioned that all color-based filter effects (not diffusion, not ND of course, but just color) could now be done just as well -no visible difference - 100% in post. Is there a caveat to that? Did I misunderstand your reply? Also, still would love to know the answer to my previous questions, which you perhaps forgot about in your very busy days (if you simply don't feel like answering it, then I apologize again if I am being annoying):

    "07-20-2012, 12:26 AM
    Hi David! I've now read this entire thread twice and have leaned so much! Thank you again on behalf of all of us!

    I have today a boring question, and perhaps a more interesting one.

    Boring: What do you use to help with IR contamination on Epic? How hot does it have to be on set before that IR filter fails?

    More interesting: Today I was having coffee with a fellow D.P., and his opinion was that more experienced you get, the fewer light sources you tend to use "It's the new DPs who feel they need twenty lights for a close-up". Would you agree with this? Do you use fewer sources now than when you started?"
    For a minor shift in color, do it in post because it's so easy and you don't have to deal with extra glass in front of the lens. But for an extreme shift in color, there is an argument to be made for getting the original halfway there so that you don't have to push the RGB gain levels in post into heavy imbalance and thus risk noise, though creating an extreme blue image from a neutral image would be more likely to add noise than creating an extreme orange one.

    I don't have an answer about how hot it gets on set before an IR filter is necessary -- I guess I assume that when it becomes a problem, I'll see that it is a problem on the monitor and address it then.

    To some degree, I keep things more simple over the years simply because I have learned to prioritize and I also like a simpler image, and too many lights and flags creates as many problems as it solves. But I will use as many lights as is necessary if I have enough time to use all of them.

    Shooting digitally has allowed me to use less lights, not necessarily because the cameras are more sensitive, though that is a factor, but because I don't have to second guess myself as much -- with film, sometimes you add a light because you are worried about something being too dark, as a safety net, etc. but with digital, you can see whether it is a problem or not.
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #4529  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,493
    Quote Originally Posted by David Mullen ASC View Post
    For a minor shift in color, do it in post because it's so easy and you don't have to deal with extra glass in front of the lens. But for an extreme shift in color, there is an argument to be made for getting the original halfway there so that you don't have to push the RGB gain levels in post into heavy imbalance and thus risk noise, though creating an extreme blue image from a neutral image would be more likely to add noise than creating an extreme orange one.

    I don't have an answer about how hot it gets on set before an IR filter is necessary -- I guess I assume that when it becomes a problem, I'll see that it is a problem on the monitor and address it then.

    To some degree, I keep things more simple over the years simply because I have learned to prioritize and I also like a simpler image, and too many lights and flags creates as many problems as it solves. But I will use as many lights as is necessary if I have enough time to use all of them.

    Shooting digitally has allowed me to use less lights, not necessarily because the cameras are more sensitive, though that is a factor, but because I don't have to second guess myself as much -- with film, sometimes you add a light because you are worried about something being too dark, as a safety net, etc. but with digital, you can see whether it is a problem or not.
    Thank you for your awesome answers as usual. the noise issue makes perfect sense. I am wondering - which brand of IR filter do you use on Epic?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #4530  
    I don't recall what we rented on "Big Sur" in terms of IR ND. We use Tiffen IR ND's on "Smash" but that is an Alexa show.
    David Mullen, ASC
    Los Angeles
    http://www.davidmullenasc.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts