Thread: Budget PL Options

Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. #21  
    Senior Member Alex Lubensky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Kiev, Ukraine
    Posts
    197
    Nope, but can try on Helium

    It’ll definitely cover helium at 6k, and maybe Gemini at 4K based on sensor size comparison chart
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22  
    Senior Member Blair S. Paulsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,223
    If S35 coverage is enough for you, used RedProPrimes are silly cheap for what they are. Not a fan of CP2s personally, but also a bargain on the used market.

    As others note, you have to decide how important operational characteristics are. If you need precise mechanics and consistent fronts/gear alignment there are fewer options. It's also worth considering the color matching across a set - is that something you don't mind compensating for in post (raw development)? Or do you want consistent color rendition from the lenses themselves?

    Cheers - #19
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23  
    Senior Member Bob Gundu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Toronto, ON Canada
    Posts
    10,136
    Schneider Xenon FF lenses are IMHO underrated.
    ___________________________

    VFX, Cinematographer, Photographer
    10 frame handles
    Vimeo
    Instagram
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Hollywood, CA
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Lubensky View Post
    Don't buy into Xeen. They are crap. Look into Sony Cinealta primes instead.
    ...for good reason.

    https://kamerawerk.ch/data/images/30...Kamerawerk.pdf
    "The tested Sony SCL PL Mount prime lenses have shown great imaging characteristics. Contrast performance, sharpness and chromatic aberration are equal if not even better compared to its competitor lenses Cooke S4, Arri Ultra Prime or Zeiss Compact Prime. As illustrated in the figure above, SCL 135mm, 25mm and 20mm actually show best mean MTF characteristics of all lenses."
    WGA West
    NABET Local 53, IATSE Local 695 (inactive)
    Sony F65, FS700 Odyssey 7Q+
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Houston TX (formerly Brooklyn NY)
    Posts
    583
    I've got a set of the sony's and they punch above their weight surely. To my eye they look like ultra primes with less micro contrast. I'll likely never sell them since they won't really fetch much of a price used since they are not in demand...

    If you're looking for a set there is one up for $9K in the marketplace.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,174
    I like my AIS Nikon set. I have no choice of course. I have no other lenses for a 35mm format camera. I originally built up the set back in the days of groundglass-based 35mm film emulators, Mini35-400, Brevis, Agus35, Letus35, SGPro et al. I subsequently used the Nikon via a focal reducer on the SI2K and they had a good look if you kept within their sweet spot of about f4-f5.6.

    Unless modified, focus pulls are not a pleasant chore. The lens rotation is also the opposite of cine lenses. They are also a little flarey and seem not as crisp as modern kenses like Xeen, CP2 and the like. If you fit third party metal focus gears to Nikons with grub screws on radial centres in the gears, be aware that some of the lens focus barrels will suffer crush deformation, the 35mm F3.5 in particular. That lens is not in my set but someone else's. It began to grind and bind during focus movements.

    They do not like being used with C-Motion controllers at all. The drivemotor gears will disengage and jump during the calibration due to additive compliance of the Nikon mount and the drivemotor rod mounts. Gears will also rotate on the lens barrels at the end stops and the calibration will fail.

    There were some variations in the Nikon F-Mount. Some older lenses will not mount to later F-Mounts without the aperture control ring binding on the shoulder of the mount itself. Third-party Nikon F-Mounts mostly seem to be patterned after the modern mount versions.

    The binding mounts can be modifed by skimming the small aperture ring overhang clearance shoulder of 0.7mm front to back further rearward by 1.0mm to the 1.7mm of the older mount and taking just a whisker off the shoulder diameter. the alterntiave it to removed material from the older style aperture control ring to match modern lenses.

    However, the lens will then no longer is genuine to the class of camera it was designed for. The mounts are narrow in diameter and are inclined to cause image shift if the lens is handled.

    A rare lens for Nikon is the Sigmatel 135 f1.8. It was apparently good enough to send into space and one may be still floating around out there.

    My prime set is :-

    Sigma for Nikon 14mm f2.8.
    Sigma for Nikon 20mm f1.8.
    Nikon 28mm f1.4.
    Nikon 35mm f1.4.
    Voigtlander for Nikon 40mm f2
    Nikon 42mm (pancake) f2.8. ( a different look, almost like cooke and softer ).
    Nikon 50mm f1.4
    Nikon 52mm f1.2
    Nikon 85mm f1.4
    Nikon 105mm f1.8
    Sigmatel for Nikon 135mm f1.8

    This is what you might expect of Nikons on an older RED cam with an 11 stop dynamic range, shot on a BM "big" URSA.

    Last edited by Robert Hart; 05-22-2020 at 11:54 AM. Reason: insert cliplink
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,174
    CP2 lenses can't be bad. Wide open on a SI2K camera with Super16mm sensor being used as a second camera at night, they were as sharp as the proper 16mm primes on the main camera and had good contrast in artificial lighing..
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts