Thread: The next generation features of cameras

Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 32 of 32
  1. #31  
    Senior Member Blair S. Paulsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,196
    I would note that part of the disconnect might be the way most projects are budgeted. Production is typically expected to capture a lot of material in a short time as cheaply as they can. A more wholistic approach that actually evaluates the total cost from planning to deliverables might make other choices.

    Cheers - #19
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #32  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,202
    Quote Originally Posted by Christoffer Glans View Post
    This is exactly what I think not should happen. The whole point is to integrate the tech into primary cameras...
    I'm not against the development and incorporation of 'new' features into the RED ecosystem, I was just trying to be realistic about what it would take for it to not only happen, but also be successful (which includes factoring in resistance from established/entrenched players in the wider 'industry') .

    I don't actually think RED would make any of the kinds of compromises I've suggested (eg. limiting functionality or making other sacrifices to get things working together), but I think that itself suggests why some of the things people are asking for might not happen (at all, or in the form they'd prefer).



    Anyway, it's all just a bit too complicated for me to write about here. I get the appeal for incorporating new features into cine-camera's, but it also makes sense why it hasn't happened, yet.


    Makes me wonder what Jarred and others in-the-know at RED wish they could do camera-feature-wise if they had unlimited resources.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts