Thread: Canon L glass IS or f2.8?

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    784
    Quote Originally Posted by Edwin Perez View Post
    It's rumoured that Canon is developing an IS version of the 24-70 f2.8L, so if you can hold out....

    http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-ef-...n-testing-cr2/
    Waiting for this to pair with the new 85mm f1.4is. Add the great 16-35 f4is and the really good 70-200 f4is + 1.4ex and on Monstro you have 16-280is covered.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member Karel Šimůnek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Czech Republic, Europe
    Posts
    366
    Quote Originally Posted by Edwin Perez View Post
    It's rumoured that Canon is developing an IS version of the 24-70 f2.8L, so if you can hold out....

    http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-ef-...n-testing-cr2/
    WOW! Didn't know that. That's a good news. Will wait and see. It would be nice to have that IS option along with f2.8 :)
    KAREL ŠIMŮNEK
    RED SCARLET-W #996 "Phoenix"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    London
    Posts
    18
    Just ordered mine this week and looking forward to shooting with them. I've had Canon L series up until now, but I don't find them fast enough. Excited to test out the Sigmas
    Cinematographer, London
    Scarlet-W
    www.joshbirchfilms.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    NW Washington
    Posts
    406
    If they made the 24-105 a 2.8L, I'd be in heaven.
    Scarlet-W "Eagle"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member KETCH ROSSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ITALY | USA
    Posts
    14,178
    "IS" lenses have a much more complex inner electronics and components that render the lens a little heavier and not as sharp, even so the latest lenses in the Canon line up are doing wonders, yet the None "IS" versions of the lenses when available are always best.

    While having a "IS" lens has its benefits in some Still Photography applications, I always preferred NONE "IS" when available, as they are always the sharpest, and lightest of the two, and don't use "IS" in high shutter Still Photography, and definitely didn't see any benefits in Motion Capture with the RED cameras.

    So my vote goes for NONE "IS".
    Philanthropist | Filmmaker | Photographer
    _________________________________________


    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts