I need the communities help with a presentation I have to give in a few weeks.
BACKGROUND:
I run the video production department of a large corporation. As you would expect, we shoot the entire gamut of project types from talking heads to high end campaigns. Recently, we purchased a RED Weapon and I have been using it to shoot still and video campaigns concurrently. For these campaigns I shoot video takes at traditional settings, then shoot takes for stills (reduce the fps and compression ratio but increase the shutter speed to 1/400). Here's the issue, a lot of my jobs involve marketing managers for the various divisions. These folks know nothing about photography or video production. They have no clue the cost or technical requirements. To make matters worse, they all need high end video and still assets but have budgets that barely cover one medium let alone both. Of course I also shoot straight up video shows at 5.5 or 6K that are to be edit in 1080p. So here is the problem...I've started to get a huge amount of uproar from this crowd. I've tried in the past to educate each of them individually with very little success. I've been getting questions like:
Problem 1:
Them: I need a still image pulled from the video you made for us for a full page magazine ad. Me: Sure, but it's not going to look that great printed in an ad...especially at that size. Them: Why, didn't you shoot the project at 6K? Me: Well, yes, but it's not going to be a sharp image because of a thing called motion blur. The resolution isn't really the issue here, it's the movement of the talent, vehicle, etc., etc. Them: I don't understand, you said this was 6K.
Problem 2:
Me: We need to increase the lighting and crew budget by "X" percentage if you want to shoot stills and video concurrently. Them: Why, you said the camera can shoot 8K. Me: Well we need more light in order to freeze the action by increasing the shutter speed. Them: I don't get it. Why are you trying to waste my money. Why don't you just shoot 6K? Me: What?
I know this is comical to most of you but it's what I deal with daily and these are real problems. A couple of weeks ago, I actually had a very experienced gaffer complain to my client that the reason we needed all this light was because we where needlessly shooting 8K. In this gaffers opinion it was a waste of time and money. (This was for one of the still and video campaigns I do where I'm shooting at a higher shutter speed.) As you can imagine, his comment has created a huge uproar. (It blew my mind that a thirty year plus gaffer doesn't know that resolution and exposure are completely independent of one another.)
Ok, I think you guys understand the problem and what I'm up against. I need to create a presentation for marketing types who have no understanding of video and photography that explains the following:
Resolution - why we shoot at a higher resolution than 1080. Topics: down sampling, cropping, CU from WS, etc.
Motion Blur - what it is, why we would want to get rid of it in a still image. Topics: Still shutter speed verse motion shutter speed to freeze action. Exposure triangle (I don't want to get into this but how else can I explain what's going on).
Cost - shooting a video and still campaign concurrently verse a dual campaign. The pros and cons. Topics: The pros and cons of each. Strobes verse hot lights. etc.
These are the big bucket areas I can think of off hand. I don't have a lot of time to but this together and I don't think this group will respond well to a lot of technical info. I need visuals...charts, diagrams, etc, etc. If anyone has any assets that I could use that might help or advise on a best approach, I'd be most appreciative.
Thanks,
Josh N.