what do you mean by contamination?
and, will long term contamination cause any other problems that you know of?
|
|
what do you mean by contamination?
and, will long term contamination cause any other problems that you know of?
It's only ambient IR "colour" contamination of recorded images - it doesn't have any long term damage implications for the camera.
Hot mirrors, because they are reflective should be the front filter to avoid unwanted light reflections bouncing back off another filter in front of it.
You can use one and only one hot mirror and it must be placed in front with the CORRECT side facing out. There must be no reflective filters or coatings downstream - only absorbtion filters. You must also use hard mattes as a well behaving boy would.
I haven't experienced any problems even with the unique Pancro ND 2.0![]()
so it is:
1 Pancro IRNDs as stand alone filters; they are to always go in front.
2 if standard NDs, then Rosco Trucolor or alike - always in front of them.
3 what about polarizer? where would that go? i'm assuming itcant be used in #1; what would be the order of it placing it in #2?
thanks!
Thanks for the post Evin. I just used the Tiffen Hot Mirror for my shoot in Japan. They were the bomb. Will post some RED stills once I get permission.
Yes.
Or Formatt/Schneider when used in conjunction with other ND's.
Just as a side note...on my last shoot, I asked for a Rosco Hot Mirror. We liked it and it performed quite well, but we had a couple beefs with it (Colton Davie was my 2nd). First, it was a pretty rough filter; the edges were straight-ground and not round and smooth like a typical filter. It's also rather thin and fragile-looking. We also had a very difficult time determining which side was the reflective side. We were able to obtain the same reflections and colour shifts from both sides. So, we picked one side and stuck with it and got great results.
In the future, I'd like to try the Schneiders for sure, as I'm a big fan of their ND's.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |