Thread: Further increasing dynamic range, but for real.

Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Hybrid View

  1. #1 Further increasing dynamic range, but for real. 
    Senior Member J. Bernard Vallon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    861
    Okay,
    From what I know about how a bayer pattern works, a thought came to me:

    If if have a RAW image, and i decide i'm going to reduce the resolution by 1/4, couldn't i have a program like redcine, or apple aperture do the following:

    Combined the values on each group of local pixels, R, G G, and B respectively, with the R, G G, and B values from its three neighbors.

    Here is a diagram:



    In this way, instead of a resulting pixel with RGB values of 0-4095, you'll have each pixel have a value of 0-16383, or a 14-bit image. It won't increase your maximum white value, as if each bayer pixel is overexposed the resulting transformed pixel will be as well. However, it would (i think) significantly increase your signal to noise ratio, because each pixel well is effectively 4 times as big, therefore gathers more light.

    What this process would end up doing, is sacrificing resolution for increased dynamic range, which is an AWESOME option, seeing as how on a 4k chip most of us will end up with a 1080p image at most.

    Is this even possible? Or am i misunderstanding something that is going on on the chip?
    John Bernard Vallon
    JBV Media
    443-834-9023
    john (a) jbvmedia.com
    www.jbvmedia.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Anders Holck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,316
    I believe the enhanced signal to noise would have the same benefit if you did an additive pixel binning in the RGB domain.
    I believe Graeme already mentioned this posibility.
    Facebook Skype: aholck
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member J. Bernard Vallon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    861
    "additive pixel binning in RGB" sounds like a good description of what i'm talking about. Is it the same thing? ...and is it possible?
    John Bernard Vallon
    JBV Media
    443-834-9023
    john (a) jbvmedia.com
    www.jbvmedia.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Anders Holck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,316
    By RGB I mean after the demosaic of the Raw image. By "Binning" I mean combining the pixels.
    Your idea seems to operate before the demosaic, I don't know if that would be feasible.
    Maybe Graeme can chime if it's possible in practice...
    Facebook Skype: aholck
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    You are absolutely right. I do that all of the time when I shoot HD for SD. Because I'm creating one SD pixel from 4-5 HD pixels, I lower the noise floor. Because I lower the noise floor, I can afford to shoot darker without it all disappearing into muck. So my whites clip less.

    Bruce Allen
    www.boacinema.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts