Search:

Got something against capitalism?
Commie bastards...:rofl:

140 MB/s actually is 1120 Mb/s... :)

https://trkeljanje.com/images/smilies/shocked1.gif https://trkeljanje.com/images/smilies/trk.gif

Oh, porn colors?
https://i.imgur.com/7Mn8Vp4.jpg

Luv'em...:rofl:

IDK...this does look noisy to me:

https://i.imgur.com/8NMCH8z.jpg

but it's because the blacks are raised (16-235 instead of 0-255?).

https://i.imgur.com/Ho0Rp9K.jpg

Now it doesn't:

I only use NLEs with cm/cprofile immunity, hehe.

The comments:


:rofl:

What do you mean "RAW"? RAW like undebayered and "ISOless" etc. - through HDMI? That even possible?

Thanks, Rand, for posting these! Gotta watch me some tube.

Yep. It's because of the filtration - you loose light on the way in, the S/N ratio drops a notch, then at the development stage the signal gets pushed a bit. It's said with STH - ISO 500. Or so. ...

Hm...it does look a bit noisier than usual, for ISO 800, to me. But then again, for STH OLPF - not that much. I'd also say that you are a stop under. Or so.
Did you use any filtration in front of...

Hi, Benjamin!
Could you repeat this test, but this time:
- Record at REDcode 5:1, not REDcode 12:1
- Record 8K, not 6K
- Record 24 fps, not 60 fps

See how it goes. :smile5:

Let's hear the man: :biggrin:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tvv7RgnUV84

Squzeme, I ain't got nothing to do with physics, it's all devilry! I only deal in wonders and miracles, thankyouverymuch!
And where's that newton thing when you need one...pufff

Um, external recording/monitoring unit?

Or as Phil already said, and I paraphrase don't shoot like this, people.
I mean, it's ok to "have" some frames overexposed, even by 10+ stops, (think sudden light bursts such as search lights or...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnhqwRQf04A

How do you like this, Karim?

The comments:


:rofl:

I know.

Unfortunate that it took an David to get an answer - from you.

(David, please don't get mad at me for using your name like this, it's all educational purposes :rofl:)



Brian,...

See, Brian, to David you listen! :biggrin:

Thanks, David! :thumbsup:

First off, I aint him.
Second off, I don't believe in trolls. Sometimes.


That's what I'm worried about.



Dang...:rofl:
It sure works with 100 ASA film, no one ever said it wouldn't, but

Hm, you're talking about determining the proper exposure then all of a sudden you go with 100 ASA...
No, we don't know the ASA, we're yet to determine it. Why would one choose 100 ASA as a base...

Well, it's how middle gray value is derived - you measure total dynamics, then you cut that in half. Put an ISO/ASA number next to it and there you go, film or sensor. :smile5:

With all due respect, with total dynamics of 20 stops it means exactly that.

I thought middle gray is ASA/ISO value where you have equal latitudes under and above. Because - middle.



What happens if you use 50 ASA film? And what with ASA 1600? Think that with 1600 ASA...

May be interesting to you, Karim.

Thanks, Jason!

https://i.imgur.com/DCUbXMa.jpg

Damn...she hot!
Who is she? :001_tt1: